Social identity cues to improve creativity and identification in face-to-face and virtual groups

This research draws on the social identity approach to investigate group performance in face-to-face and virtual brainstorming settings. In particular, we display Social Identity Cues (SIC) on participants or on avatars to foster group membership. We compare four conditions in a factorial design: Brainstorming in Face-to-face or Virtual setting, With or Without SIC. Seventy-two students belonging to a population with a strong social identity participated in the experiment, using their traditional clothing as SIC. The results show that the presence of SIC led to increased creative performance both in face-to-face and virtual settings. SIC also increased group identification, but only in the virtual environment. These results highlight the potential of avatars to support teamwork in a meaningful way. Traditional clothing of a specific student group acts as social identity cues.Face-to-face and avatar-mediated electronic brainstorming are compared.Impact of social identity cues is examined in face-to-face and virtual groups.Social identity cues improved performance both in real and virtual settings.

[1]  John C. Turner,et al.  Stereotyping and Social Reality , 1994 .

[2]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Julien Nelson,et al.  The Relationship Between Contextual Cues in Virtual Environments and Creative Processes , 2017, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[5]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[6]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[8]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Understanding the Group Size Effect in Electronic Brainstorming , 2013 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Communication Concurrency and the New Media , 1993 .

[10]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[11]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[12]  Eun-Ju Lee.  Effects of Visual Representation on Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Tests of the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects. , 2004 .

[13]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[14]  L. Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams Research , 2015 .

[15]  J. Glover,et al.  Handbook of creativity. , 1989 .

[16]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[17]  E. Day,et al.  Social identity and individual productivity within groups. , 1998, The British journal of social psychology.

[18]  Rob Procter,et al.  An investigation of social loafing and social compensation in computer-supported cooperative work , 1999, GROUP.

[19]  A. Osborn.  Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving , 1957 .

[20]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[21]  Keith James,et al.  In-Group Salience, Intergroup Comparison, and Individual Performance and Self-Esteem , 1989 .

[22]  Annique Smeding,et al.  Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): An Investigation of Their Implicit Gender Stereotypes and Stereotypes’ Connectedness to Math Performance , 2012, Sex Roles.

[23]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Social identity, group processes and performance in synchronous computer-mediated communication , 2004 .

[24]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[25]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Blocking electronic brainstorms. , 1994 .

[26]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Do many hands make light work?: How to overcome social loafing and gain motivation in work teams , 2009 .

[27]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity intention: Social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[29]  Nancy J. Stone,et al.  Windows and Environmental Cues on Performance and Mood , 1998 .

[30]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[31]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior , 2007 .

[32]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2002 .

[33]  John T. Willse,et al.  Assessing Creativity With Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods , 2008 .

[34]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication , 2004 .

[35]  Michael A. Wallach,et al.  Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. , 1965 .

[36]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[37]  Harry L. Miller.  Formation of group norms. , 1953 .

[38]  Stéphanie Buisine,et al.  Why are online games so self‐involving: A social identity analysis of massively multiplayer online role‐playing games , 2015 .

[39]  John C. Turner,et al.  Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self‐categorization and accentuation , 1992 .

[40]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .

[42]  Olivier Le Bohec,et al.  Social gaming is inSIDE: Impact of anonymity and group identity on performance in a team game-based learning environment , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[43]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[44]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[45]  Patrick A. Tissington,et al.  Group membership salience and task performance , 2009 .

[46]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[47]  Ulrich Wagner,et al.  Variation of out‐group presence and evaluation of the in‐group , 1993 .

[48]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[49]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Unblocking brainstorms. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  M. Huysman,et al.  Does Avatar Appearance Matter? How Team Visual Similarity and Member–Avatar Similarity Influence Virtual Team Performance , 2015 .

[52]  Canan Ceylan,et al.  Can the office environment stimulate a manager's creativity? , 2008 .

[53]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  Two Routes Leading to Conformity Intention in Computer-Mediated Groups: Matching Versus Mismatching Virtual Representations , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[54]  Alwin de Rooij,et al.  The Creative Proteus Effect: How Self-Similarity, Embodiment, and Priming of Creative Stereotypes with Avatars Influences Creative Ideation , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[55]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[56]  Blake Rl,et al.  A single-item measure of social supports as a predictor of morbidity. , 1986 .

[57]  Jorge Peña,et al.  The Priming Effects of Avatars in Virtual Settings , 2009, Commun. Res..

[58]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Cues to Identity in Online Dyads: Effects of Interpersonal Versus Intragroup Perceptions on Performance , 2008 .

[59]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Preventing social loafing in the collaborative technology classroom , 1997, SIGCPR '97.

[60]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[61]  Anit Somech,et al.  Is Group Productivity Loss the Rule or The Exception? Effects of Culture and Group-Based Motivation , 1996 .

[62]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[63]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[64]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task , 2002 .

[65]  Carlos Martinho,et al.  Effects of Human vs. Computer-Controlled Characters and Social Identity Cues on Enjoyment: Mediation Effects of Presence, Similarity, and Group Identification , 2019, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[66]  Frédéric Segonds,et al.  Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[67]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[68]  Nicolas Michinov.  Is Electronic Brainstorming or Brainwriting the Best Way to Improve Creative Performance in Groups? An Overlooked Comparison of Two Idea-Generation Techniques , 2012 .

[69]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  Using avatars to tailor ideation process to innovation strategy , 2016, Cognition, Technology & Work.