Public perception of the performance of Czech forest ecosystem services
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Purwestri,et al. From recreational to income-generating opportunities: assessment of public preferences for non-wood forest products in the Czech Republic , 2023, Frontiers in nutrition.
[2] J. Soukupová,et al. Wild Mushrooms as a Source of Protein: A Case Study from Central Europe, Especially the Czech Republic , 2023, Foods.
[3] V. Jarský,et al. Bioeconomy-based tourism: A new concept responding to the support of bioeconomy , 2023, Frontiers in Environmental Science.
[4] D. Önkal,et al. Increased appreciation of forests and their restorative effects during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2023, Ambio.
[5] Thorsen,et al. Governing Europe's forests for multiple ecosystem services: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options , 2022, Forest Policy and Economics.
[6] M. Hájek,et al. Demand for forest ecosystem services: a comparison study in selected areas in the Czech Republic and China , 2022, European Journal of Forest Research.
[7] D. Zahradník,et al. Forest Attendance in the Times of COVID-19—A Case Study on the Example of the Czech Republic , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[8] Anna Karlberg,et al. Innovative forest products in the circular bioeconomy , 2022, Open research Europe.
[9] J. Kašpar,et al. The Role of Bioeconomy in the Czech National Forest Strategy: A Comparison with Sweden , 2022, International Forestry Review.
[10] S. Gingrich,et al. Forest Transitions in the United States, France and Austria: dynamics of forest change and their socio- metabolic drivers , 2022, Journal of land use science.
[11] M. Hájek,et al. Anchor of cultural forest services in the national forest policies of Central European countries , 2021, Central European Forestry Journal.
[12] B. Bentz,et al. Scientific response to intensifying bark beetle outbreaks in Europe and North America , 2021 .
[13] Miroslav Hájek,et al. Societal Implications of Forest and Water Body Area Evolution in Czechia and Selected Regions , 2021, Remote. Sens..
[14] P. Štěpánek,et al. Devastating outbreak of bark beetles in the Czech Republic: Drivers, impacts, and management implications , 2021 .
[15] A. Jagodziński,et al. Forest land use discontinuity and northern red oak Quercus rubra introduction change biomass allocation and life strategy of lingonberry Vaccinium vitis-idaea , 2021, Forest Ecosystems.
[16] G. Fiorese,et al. Boosting the EU forest-based bioeconomy: Market, climate, and employment impacts , 2020 .
[17] M. Hájek,et al. Current state and future directions of bioeconomy in the Czech Republic. , 2020, New biotechnology.
[18] D. Zahradník,et al. Analysis of Significant Factors Influencing the Amount of Collected Forest Berries in the Czech Republic , 2020, Forests.
[19] Michael Böcher,et al. Research trends: Bioeconomy politics and governance , 2020, Forest Policy and Economics.
[20] Petro Marek. Transformation of the identity of a region: Theory and the empirical case of the perceptual regions of Bohemia and Moravia, Czech Republic , 2020 .
[21] G. Winkel,et al. COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure , 2020, Forest Policy and Economics.
[22] K. Stereńczak,et al. Health Assessment and Genetic Structure of Monumental Norway Spruce Trees during A Bark Beetle (Ips typographus L.) Outbreak in the Białowieża Forest District, Poland , 2020, Forests.
[23] M. Hájek,et al. Drivers and Frequency of Forest Visits: Results of a National Survey in the Czech Republic , 2020, Forests.
[24] J. Škvarenina,et al. The Influence of Local Habitat and Microclimate on the Levels of Secondary Metabolites in Slovak Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) Fruits , 2020, Plants.
[25] G. Weiss,et al. Actor power in the restitution processes of forests in three European countries in transition , 2020 .
[26] M. Heurich,et al. Do bark beetle outbreaks amplify or dampen future bark beetle disturbances in Central Europe? , 2020, The Journal of ecology.
[27] M. Hájek,et al. How Are Wood and Non-Wood Forest Products Utilized in the Czech Republic? A Preliminary Assessment of a Nationwide Survey on the Bioeconomy , 2020, Sustainability.
[28] L. Arroja,et al. Surface vs. groundwater: The effect of forest cover on the costs of drinking water , 2019, Water Resources and Economics.
[29] O. Kotavaara,et al. Mapping supply and demand of a provisioning ecosystem service across Europe , 2019, Ecological Indicators.
[30] Krkoška Lorencová,et al. Perception of Climate Change Risk and Adaptation in the Czech Republic , 2019, Climate.
[31] Sandro Sacchelli,et al. Integrated Management of Forest Ecosystem Services: An Optimization Model Based on Multi-objective Analysis and Metaheuristic Approach , 2018, Natural Resources Research.
[32] K. Adamčíková,et al. Two blue-stain fungi colonizing Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) trees infested by bark beetles in Slovakia, Central Europe , 2018, Biologia.
[33] J. Rutkayová,et al. Fish stock losses due to extreme floods – findings from pond‐based aquaculture in the Czech Republic , 2018 .
[34] Roy Haines-Young,et al. Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief , 2018, One Ecosystem.
[35] C. Ringler,et al. Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review , 2018, Ecosystem Services.
[36] P. Gobster,et al. Visitor Preferences for Visual Changes in Bark Beetle-Impacted Forest Recreation Settings in the United States and Germany , 2017, Environmental Management.
[37] Matthew J. McGrath,et al. Representing anthropogenic gross land use change, wood harvest, and forest age dynamics in a global vegetation model ORCHIDEE-MICT v8.4.2 , 2017 .
[38] J. Vávra,et al. Local perception of floods in the Czech Republic and recent changes in state flood management strategies , 2017 .
[39] A. Toppinen,et al. Perceptions of the general public on forest sector responsibility: A survey related to ecosystem services and forest sector business impacts in four European countries , 2017 .
[40] R. Bertrand,et al. Recent growth changes in Western European forests are driven by climate warming and structured across tree species climatic habitats , 2017, Annals of Forest Science.
[41] A. Toppinen,et al. Forest company dependencies and impacts on ecosystem services: Expert perceptions from China , 2017 .
[42] A. Jönsson,et al. Historical experience (1850–1950 and 1961–2014) of insect species responsible for forest damage in Sweden: Influence of climate and land management changes , 2016 .
[43] Stanley T. Asah,et al. Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: Human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications , 2014 .
[44] F. Berkes,et al. What value São Pedro's procession? Ecosystem services from local people's perceptions , 2014 .
[45] K. Harashina,et al. Living close to forests enhances people׳s perception of ecosystem services in a forest–agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia , 2014 .
[46] E. Huber‐Sannwald,et al. Forest structure, species traits and rain characteristics influences on horizontal and vertical rainfall partitioning in a semiarid pine–oak forest from Central Mexico , 2014 .
[47] Kamila Reczyńska,et al. Variability of Abies alba-dominated forests in Central Europe , 2014, Central European Journal of Biology.
[48] Henrik Andrén,et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species , 2013, Nature Communications.
[49] N. Crossman,et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units , 2012 .
[50] J. Gonzalez,et al. Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences , 2012, PloS one.
[51] Robert J. Brulle,et al. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010 , 2012, Climatic Change.
[52] K. Chan,et al. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .
[53] Yadvinder Malhi,et al. The productivity, metabolism and carbon cycle of tropical forest vegetation , 2012 .
[54] I. Horáček,et al. Paleolithic hunting in a southern Moravian landscape: The case of Milovice IV, Czech Republic , 2011 .
[55] Sandro Sacchelli,et al. The evaluation of forest crop damages due to climate change. An application of Dempster–Shafer method , 2011 .
[56] D. Kuijper. Lack of natural control mechanisms increases wildlife–forestry conflict in managed temperate European forest systems , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.
[57] F. Jiguet,et al. Bio economic modeling for a sustainable management of biodiversity in agricultural lands , 2011 .
[58] R. D. Groot,et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .
[59] J. Hartter. Resource Use and Ecosystem Services in a Forest Park Landscape , 2010 .
[60] Ciscar Martinez Juan Carlos. Climate change impacts in Europe Final report of the PESETA research project , 2009 .
[61] P. Burgess,et al. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands , 2009 .
[62] P. Ciais,et al. Carbon accumulation in European forests , 2008 .
[63] Manasi Kumar,et al. Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective , 2008 .
[64] T. Vrška,et al. Trends and cyclical changes in natural fir-beech Forests at the north-western edge of the Carpathians , 2007, Folia Geobotanica.
[65] R. Hansmann,et al. Urban Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Non-wood Forest Products and Services in Switzerland and an Assessment of Their Market Potential , 2007, Small-scale Forestry.
[66] Martin Drechsler,et al. Ecological-economic modelling for the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity , 2007 .
[67] Ralf Seppelt,et al. Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale , 2007 .
[68] N. Dudley,et al. Managing forests for cleaner water for urban populations. , 2007 .
[69] J. Schipperijn,et al. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas , 2007 .
[70] S. Piao,et al. Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China , 2005 .
[71] Van Ryzin,et al. Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services , 2004 .
[72] M. T. Ahmed. Millennium ecosystem assessment , 2002, Environmental science and pollution research international.
[73] L. Mattsson,et al. Forest ecosystem research — priorities for Europe , 2000 .
[74] C. Fornell,et al. Expectations, perceived performance, and customer satisfaction for a complex service: The case of bank loans , 1996 .
[75] T. Staszewski,et al. Mineral status of plants and soil in silver fir stands of the Silesian and Żywiec Beskidy (Western Carpathians) , 2017 .
[76] Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure , 2017 .
[77] M. Riedl,et al. Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic—Their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use , 2016 .
[78] W. Bewket,et al. Community perceptions of forest–water relationships in the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia , 2014 .
[79] Anja K. Primetta,et al. Phenolic compounds in the berries of the selected Vaccinium species.: The potential for authenticity analyses. , 2014 .
[80] G. Weiss,et al. Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustainability Impact Assessment of Forest Management Alternatives in Europe Public Preferences Across Europe for Different Forest Stand Types as Sites for Recreation , 2012 .
[81] V. Sidorovich,et al. Landscape-related differences in diet, food supply and distribution pattern of the pine marten, Martes martes in the transitional mixed forest of northern Belarus , 2005 .
[82] E. Pouta,et al. Participation in mushroom picking in Finland , 2004 .
[83] A. Lindhagen,et al. Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: changes in public preferences and behaviour , 2000 .
[84] X. Font,et al. Recreation, conservation and timber production: a sustainable relationship? , 1999 .
[85] J. Ardö. Remote Sensing of Forest Decline in the Czech Republic , 1998 .