Statistical Segmentation of fMRI Activations Using Contextual Clustering

A central problem in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is the reliable detection and segmentation of activated areas. Often this goal is achieved by computing a statistical parametric map (SPM) and thresholding it. Cluster-size thresholds are also used. A new contextual segmentation method based on clustering is presented in this paper. If the SPM value of a voxel, adjusted with neighborhood information, differs from the expected non-activation value more than a specified decision value, the contextual clustering algorithm classifies the voxel to the activation class, otherwise to the non-activation class. The voxel-wise thresholding, cluster-size thresholding and contextual clustering are compared using fixed overall specificity. Generally, the contextual clustering detects activations with higher probability than the voxel-wise thresholding. Unlike cluster-size thresholding, contextual clustering is able to detect extremely small area activations, too. Moreover, the results show that the contextual clustering has good segmentation accuracy, voxel-wise specificity and robustness against spatial autocorrelations in the noise term.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[3]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[4]  J Xiong,et al.  Assessment and optimization of functional MRI analyses , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  Activation detection in functional MRI using subspace modeling and maximum likelihood estimation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  William Mendenhall,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[10]  K. Kwong Functional magnetic resonance imaging with echo planar imaging. , 1995, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[11]  J. Susan Milton,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences , 1990 .

[12]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Detecting and Inferring Brain Activation from Functional MRI by Hypothesis-Testing Based on the Likelihood Ratio , 1998, MICCAI.