Social structure modulates the evolutionary consequences of social plasticity: A social network perspective on interacting phenotypes
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pierre-Olivier Montiglio | Damien R Farine | D. Farine | Pierre-Olivier Montiglio | Joel W McGlothlin | J. McGlothlin
[1] P. Nonacs,et al. Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[2] J. Terborgh,et al. Oddity and the ‘confusion effect’ in predation , 1986, Animal Behaviour.
[3] M. Taborsky,et al. Animal personality due to social niche specialisation. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[4] D. Nussey,et al. The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[5] T. Clutton‐Brock,et al. Mammalian mating systems. , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[6] N. Bunnefeld,et al. Express your personality or go along with the group: what determines the behaviour of shoaling perch? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[7] B. Voelkl,et al. Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, Parus major , 2015, Animal Behaviour.
[8] Damien R. Farine,et al. Measuring phenotypic assortment in animal social networks: weighted associations are more robust than binary edges , 2014, Animal Behaviour.
[9] P. McGregor,et al. Extra-pair paternity among Great Tits Parus major following manipulation of male signals , 2001 .
[10] M. Wade,et al. On Indirect Genetic Effects in Structured Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[11] R. Duckworth. Aggressive behaviour affects selection on morphology by influencing settlement patterns in a passerine bird , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[12] A. J. Moore,et al. INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[13] Michael D Greenfield,et al. Frogs Have Rules: Selective Attention Algorithms Regulate Chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae) , 2000 .
[14] H. Howe,et al. INTERACTION AND COEVOLUTION. , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[15] E. Brodie,et al. Consistency of animal social networks after disturbance , 2017 .
[16] P. Colgan,et al. Animal Conflict , 1987, Chapman and Hall Animal Behaviour Series.
[17] J. Simmons,et al. Analyzing acoustic interactions in natural bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) choruses. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[18] Noa Pinter-Wollman,et al. Behavioural hypervolumes of spider communities predict community performance and disbandment , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[19] W. Muir,et al. Multilevel Selection 2: Estimating the Genetic Parameters Determining Inheritance and Response to Selection , 2007, Genetics.
[20] A. J. Moore,et al. Interacting Phenotypes and the Evolutionary Process. II. Selection Resulting from Social Interactions , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[21] Damien R. Farine,et al. Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.
[22] Hilla Peretz,et al. Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .
[23] Denis Réale,et al. Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[24] H. Fushing,et al. The “strength of weak ties” and helminth parasitism in giraffe social networks , 2016 .
[25] J. Saltz,et al. Natural Genetic Variation in Social Niche Construction: Social Effects of Aggression Drive Disruptive Sexual Selection in Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, The American Naturalist.
[26] Noa Pinter-Wollman,et al. The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[27] Torben Dabelsteen,et al. Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners , 1990, Animal Behaviour.
[28] C. Both. Experimental evidence for density dependence of reproduction in great tits , 1998 .
[29] I. Owens,et al. Sibling competition and the evolution of growth rates in birds , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[30] T. Caraco,et al. Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .
[31] Andreas P. Modlmeier,et al. The keystone individual concept: an ecological and evolutionary overview , 2014, Animal Behaviour.
[32] J. Saltz,et al. What, if anything, is a social niche? , 2016, Evolutionary Ecology.
[33] Damien R. Farine,et al. Proximity as a proxy for interactions: issues of scale in social network analysis , 2015, Animal Behaviour.
[34] H. Klug,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS CHANGES PREDICTIONS ABOUT INTERACTING PHENOTYPES , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[35] A. Thornton,et al. Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.
[36] E. Brodie,et al. How to Measure Indirect Genetic Effects: The Congruence of Trait-Based and Variance-Partitioning Approaches , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[37] A. Mcadam,et al. Social traits, social networks and evolutionary biology , 2017, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[38] David F Westneat,et al. Individual Variation in Parental Care Reaction Norms: Integration of Personality and Plasticity , 2011, The American Naturalist.
[39] Andrea Megela Simmons,et al. Patterns of Vocal Interactions in a Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) Chorus: Preferential Responding to Far Neighbors , 2000 .
[40] P. Crowley,et al. Intraguild mutualism. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[41] N. Bailey,et al. DETECTING CRYPTIC INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[42] K. Foster,et al. Assortment and the analysis of natural selection on social traits , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[43] J. Pruitt,et al. Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[44] J. Krause,et al. The role of individuality in collective group movement , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[45] T. W. Fawcett,et al. change with age and experience Learning your own strength : winner and loser effects should , 2010 .
[46] W. Muir,et al. Multilevel Selection 1: Quantitative Genetics of Inheritance and Response to Selection , 2007, Genetics.
[47] E. Danchin,et al. Assortative Mating and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Black-legged Kittiwakes , 2004 .
[48] Age Differences in the Responses to Adult and Juvenile Alarm Calls by Bonnet Macaques (Macaca radiata) , 2000 .
[49] M. West-Eberhard. Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity , 1989 .
[50] O. Schmitz,et al. Fear on the move: predator hunting mode predicts variation in prey mortality and plasticity in prey spatial response. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.
[51] R. Cantet,et al. Direct and Competition Additive Effects in Tree Breeding: Bayesian Estimation From an Individual Tree Mixed Model , 2008 .
[52] A. J. Moore,et al. INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS. III. SOCIAL EVOLUTION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[53] D. Réale,et al. Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[54] J. Krause,et al. Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy , 2009 .
[55] A. Sih,et al. Multilevel selection and effects of keystone hyperaggressive males on mating success and behavior in stream water striders , 2013 .
[56] M. Zuk,et al. Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (Ψ) , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[57] E. Lonsdorf,et al. COMMUNITY HERITABILITY MEASURES THE EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS ON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[58] R. R. Krausz. Living in Groups , 2013 .
[59] R. A. Hinde,et al. Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure , 1976 .
[60] R. E. Butterfield,et al. Fitness consequences of social network position in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus) , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[61] D. Réale,et al. Social niche specialization under constraints: personality, social interactions and environmental heterogeneity , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[62] M. Wade,et al. The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[63] Andrew Sih,et al. The mix matters: behavioural types and group dynamics in water striders , 2005 .