Computed tomography bone density in Hounsfield units at dental implant receiving sites in different regions of the jaw bone

Background: Determination of local bone mineral density (BMD) with cortical thickness and bone height may offer a comprehensive description of the bone the surgeon will encounter when he or she actually sets the implant. Quantitative computed tomography (CT) (i.e., quantitative interpretation of values derived from Hounsfield units with a suitable calibration procedure) is the modality of choice to determine BMD. The aim of the present clinical study is to determine the local bone density in dental implant recipient sites using computerized tomography. Material and method: The sample consisted of (72) Iraqi patients whom referred to Al-Kharkh General hospital, Spiral CT scan Department for bone quality and quantity assessment after one week of dental implants insertion, the average of bone density was measured for 120 areas indifferent sectors of maxilla and mandible in Hounsfield unite. Results: As a mean, males show higher bone density than females, decreased with increased age significantly, mandible show significantly higher bone density than maxilla. Maxilla revealed no significant difference between the three sectors, while in the mandible there was significant difference between posterior sector (613.1HU)and both anterior (821.3 HU) and premolar sectors (779.6 HU) with no significant difference between anterior and premolar sectors. Conclusion: CT-Scan may provide a valuable aid to predict bone quality at potential implant sites and could be used to assess the change of bone density around dental implants.

[1]  Y. Morimoto,et al.  Potential Risk of Asymptomatic Osteomyelitis around Mandibular Third Molar Tooth for Aged People: A Computed Tomography and Histopathologic Study , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  E. T. Daif Effect of a multiporous beta-tricalicum phosphate on bone density around dental implants inserted into fresh extraction sockets. , 2013, The Journal of oral implantology.

[3]  J. Correia,et al.  Evaluation of dental implants using Computed Tomography , 2013, 2013 IEEE 3rd Portuguese Meeting in Bioengineering (ENBENG).

[4]  S. Mallya,et al.  Bone quality evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  O. Geçkili,et al.  How Precise Is Dental Volumetric Tomography in the Prediction of Bone Density? , 2012, International journal of dentistry.

[6]  M. Wada,et al.  Assessment of bone density in the posterior maxilla based on Hounsfield units to enhance the initial stability of implants. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[7]  C. Bourauel,et al.  Simulating the trabecular bone structure around dental implants: a case presentation , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[8]  Y. Akagawa,et al.  Preoperative Computed Tomography-Derived Bone Densities in Hounsfield Units at Implant Sites Acquired Primary Stability , 2011, ISRN dentistry.

[9]  K. Orhan,et al.  Correlation Between Bone Density and Angular Deviation of Implants Placed Using CT-Generated Surgical Guides , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[10]  Barunawaty Yunus Assessment of the increased calcification of the jaw bone with CT-Scan after dental implant placement , 2011, Imaging science in dentistry.

[11]  M. Gomzi,et al.  Differences in Peak Bone Density Between Male and Female Students , 2009, Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju.

[12]  Ilser Turkyilmaz,et al.  Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study , 2008, BMC oral health.

[13]  C. Lindh,et al.  Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  I. Turkyilmaz,et al.  Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  W. Rand,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  P. Trisi,et al.  Bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry are statistically related. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  C. Gamble,et al.  Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry , 1985 .

[19]  Núria Farré-Pagés,et al.  Relation between bone density and primary implant stability. , 2011, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[20]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Patient selection and preparation , 1985 .