Predictive Risk Factors for Clinically Related Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Analysis of 248 Patients

Objective: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) affects 13-50% of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and remains the main source of post-PD morbidity and mortality. Therefore, determining predictive risk factors for POPF remains popular today. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictive risk factors for clinically related postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) in the preoperative and early postoperative period in patients that underwent PD. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 248 patients who underwent PD between January 2015 and December 2019 in our center. We compared the groups that did and did not develop CR-POPF. We determined the risk factors affecting CR-POPF by stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: 141 (56.8%) of the patients included in the study were male and the median age was 63 (56-70)/year. The CR-POPF rate was 18.1%. We found a statistically significant difference (p <0.05) in the following parameters: diabetes, smoking, preoperative leukocyte, preoperative neutrophil, postoperative first day (POD1) amylase, POD1 AST, POD1 ALT, POD1 CRP, POD1 lymphocyte-CRP ratio (LCR), postoperative third day (POD3) lymphocyte, POD3 CRP, in POD3 neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, POD3 platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), POD3 AST-ALT ratio, POD3 LCR, surgeon experience, incision type, Wirsung diameter, pancreatic tissue and operation time. In the stepwise logistic regression model, we found POD1 AST, POD3 CRP, POD3 TLR, diabetes, surgeon experience, and Wirsung diameter as predictive risk factors. Conclusions: In our study, we found POD1 AST, POD3 CRP, POD3 TLR, diabetes, surgeon experience and Wirsung diameter as predictive risk factors for CR-POPF.

[1]  B. Peng,et al.  Dynamic prediction for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula: a novel prediction model for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2021, BMC Surgery.

[2]  B. Taşdelen,et al.  The factors of pancreatic fistula development in patients who underwent classical pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2020, Annali italiani di chirurgia.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2020 , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  R. Parks,et al.  Pre-, peri- and post-operative factors for the development of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. , 2019, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[5]  H. Fujii,et al.  Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery , 2019, World journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  M. Ida,et al.  Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as indicator to severe complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy , 2019, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[7]  D. Raptis,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula rates using the updated 2016 International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula definition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection with soft and hard pancreatic texture. , 2018, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[8]  J. Samra,et al.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts , 2018, Clinical and experimental gastroenterology.

[9]  M. Falconi,et al.  Early Postoperative Prediction of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: usefulness of C-reactive Protein. , 2017, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[10]  S. Pedrazzoli Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) , 2017, Medicine.

[11]  D. Gouma,et al.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After , 2017, Surgery.

[12]  Jia-hong Dong,et al.  Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2016, World journal of gastroenterology.

[13]  E. Kınacı,et al.  Intraoperative acidosis is a new predictor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2016, Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT.

[14]  G. Spolverato,et al.  C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin as Predictors of Postoperative Inflammatory Complications After Pancreatic Surgery , 2016, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[15]  N. Jamieson,et al.  Serum amylase and C‐reactive protein in risk stratification of pancreas‐specific complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2016, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Early Drain Removal--The Middle Ground Between the Drain Versus No Drain Debate in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Validation Study. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[17]  P. Laterre,et al.  Early hyperlactatemia predicts pancreatic fistula after surgery , 2015, BMC Anesthesiology.

[18]  R. Hutchins,et al.  Limited utility of inflammatory markers in the early detection of postoperative inflammatory complications after pancreatic resection: Cohort study and meta-analyses. , 2015, International journal of surgery.

[19]  Jia-hong Dong,et al.  Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2014, World journal of gastroenterology.

[20]  R. Segersvärd,et al.  The diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in the individual risk assessment for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2013 .

[21]  A. Ruzzenente,et al.  Systematic review of central pancreatectomy and meta‐analysis of central versus distal pancreatectomy , 2013, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  A. Andrén-sandberg,et al.  Structured intraoperative assessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predicting complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[24]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[25]  K. Campbell,et al.  Biochemical markers predict morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[26]  Yongjie Zhang,et al.  Predictive factors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2007, The Journal of surgical research.

[27]  J. Neoptolemos,et al.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. , 2005, Surgery.

[28]  Ashok Kumar,et al.  Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.

[29]  K. Bertens,et al.  Use and acceptance of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition and criteria in the surgical literature. , 2018, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[30]  N. Ke,et al.  Triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with resection of jejunal serosa decreased pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2014, The Journal of surgical research.

[31]  P. Bachellier,et al.  Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association. , 2014, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[32]  H. Friess,et al.  Persisting elevation of C-reactive protein after pancreatic resections can indicate developing inflammatory complications. , 2008, Surgery.