Recursive Bias Estimation and Orbit Determination

O RBIT determination algorithms are designed to estimate satellite position and inertial velocity from unbiased sensor measurements. Static and dynamic measurement biases, which are low-frequency systematic errors, cause biases in both position and velocity estimates that can significantly degrade track accuracy. As only the random error statistics are characterized, the filter covariance usually underestimates the biased track error statistics. Track biases and covariance fidelity are important issues for correlation and fusion of multiple sensor tracks [1,2]. Many algorithms have been developed [3–10] for estimation of bias parameters in the system dynamics, in the measurements, or in both. Generally, bias parameters are estimated jointly with the position and velocity states. Depending on the number of bias parameters, this approach can be computationally intensive, the system covariance matrix can become ill conditioned, and bias-state observability and separability can be problematic. Alternatively, two-step techniques extract bias parameters from the track measurement residuals. For current radar systems, measurement biases are calibrated by tracking one metric satellite having an accurate ephemeris, or by tracking many satellites with less accurate ephemerides [9]. Range and angle biases are calibrated after (not during) the data collection (s). A noteworthy exception is a real-time algorithm for angle bias estimation in wideband radars [10]. In this Note, an iterated 12-state extended Kalman filter EKF(12) is formulated for simultaneous (real-time) orbit determination and bias estimation. Orbit position and velocity states are augmented with six dynamic (rather than static) bias states that model radar orientation biases and radar range-angle measurement biases. Biasstate observability and separability are enhanced by physical models for the bias dynamics and by careful characterization of bias effects in the measurement residuals. For example, random and certain environmental (i.e., tropospheric) bias errors are intrinsic to the radar measurements, whereas radar orientation biases corrupt the transformation of the prior position estimate from inertial to radar coordinates. Performance evaluations will demonstrate accurate real-time state estimates and excellent covariance fidelity, which are essential for radar-to-radar track correlation and fusion. II. Sensor Models

[1]  B. Bean Comparison of observed tropospheric refraction with values computed from the surface refractivity , 1961 .

[2]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  Consider Covariance Analysis , 2004 .

[3]  B. Tapley,et al.  Adaptive sequential estimation with unknown noise statistics , 1976 .

[4]  Robert J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Effects of Range-Doppler Coupling on Chirp Radar Tracking Accuracy , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  U. Nickel,et al.  Overview of generalized monopulse estimation , 2006, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[6]  B. Friedland Treatment of bias in recursive filtering , 1969 .

[7]  Michael E. Hough Improved Performance of Recursive Tracking Filters Using Batch Initialization and Process Noise Adaptation , 1998 .

[8]  S. Challa,et al.  Joint sensor registration and track-to-track fusion for distributed trackers , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  E. Altshuler,et al.  Tropospheric range-error corrections for the Global Positioning System , 1998 .

[10]  R. Fitzgerald,et al.  Decoupled Kalman filters for phased array radar tracking , 1983 .

[11]  D. Lerro,et al.  Bias compensation for improved recursive bearings-only target state estimation , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[12]  Hamish Meikle,et al.  Modern Radar Systems , 2001 .

[13]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multisensor target tracking performance with bias compensation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  K. Morrison Effective bandwidth SF-CW SAR increase using frequency agility , 2006, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[15]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[16]  T. R. Rice,et al.  On the optimality of two-stage state estimation in the presence of random bias , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  B. Tapley,et al.  Statistical Orbit Determination , 2004 .

[18]  Bernard Friedland,et al.  Notes on separate-bias estimation , 1978 .