Under Surveillance, Yet Looked After: Telehomecare as Viewed by Patients and Their Spouse/Partners

Introduction: In this research project, a group of heart patients were transferred from traditional hospital settings to home hospitalisation across sectors. The project involved patients with heart failure and arrhythmia. Aim: The aim was to understand the experiences and attitudes of patients and their spouses/partners with regard to the application of telehomecare technology as an option within home hospitalisation. Methods: A phenomenological hermeneutic approach was used to collect and interpret the findings and data. A triangulation of data collection techniques was applied using participation observation and qualitative interviews with patients and spouse/partner. Data were analysed from the perspective of the sociology of everyday life. Findings: The impact of home hospitalisation on patients is described according to several themes: security, freedom, increased awareness of own symptoms, being ‘looked after’ but annoyed with their spouse/partner. The patients experience a seamless cross-sector patient care process. The impact on the spouse/partner includes elements of increased responsibility, nervous tension, and invasion of privacy. Conclusion: Patients believe that home hospitalisation speeds up the process of returning to everyday life, both physically and mentally. It is important to be aware of certain anxieties experienced by the patient's spouse/partner about home hospitalisation, and these anxieties may also affect the patient.

[1]  N. Young,et al.  Preference for pediatric telehome care support following hospitalization: a report on preference and satisfaction. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  S. K. Andersen,et al.  Implementation of the concept of home hospitalisation for heart patients by means of telehomecare technology: integration of clinical tasks , 2007, International journal of integrated care.

[3]  Nir Menachemi,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Telemedicine—A Multiple Adopter Perspective , 2004, Journal of Medical Systems.

[4]  Ann Bygholm,et al.  Copability, coping, and learning as focal concepts in the evaluation of computerised diabetes disease management , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[6]  C. Mattingly,et al.  Narrative and the Cultural Construction of Illness and Healing , 2001 .

[7]  Vivian L. West,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine , 2000 .

[8]  G. Demiris,et al.  Assessment of Patients' Acceptance of and Satisfaction with Teledermatology , 2004, Journal of medical systems.

[9]  Bonnie J Wakefield,et al.  Telehealth for Elders and Their Caregivers in Rural Communities , 2002, Family & community health.

[10]  Linda Little,et al.  E-health , 2008, BCS HCI.

[11]  O. Ferrer-Roca,et al.  Aviation medicine: challenges for telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  E. Hanson,et al.  The impact of information and communication technology on family carers of older people and professionals in Sweden , 2005, Ageing and Society.

[13]  S. Kvale The Qualitative Research Interview , 1983 .

[14]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1999 .

[15]  D. Hailey,et al.  Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  C. May,et al.  Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. , 2001, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  G Demiris,et al.  Change of patients' perceptions of TeleHomeCare. , 2001, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[19]  K. Hartford Telenursing and patients' recovery from bypass surgery. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  Carl May,et al.  Towards a wireless patient: chronic illness, scarce care and technological innovation in the United Kingdom. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[21]  Povl Erik Rostgaard Andersen,et al.  Qualitative evaluation of a diabetes advisory system, DiasNet , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  Janet Reis,et al.  An e-Learning Caregiving Program for Prostate Cancer Patients and Family Members , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.

[23]  James Wallace,et al.  Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review , 2001, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[24]  C. Mattingly,et al.  Psychotherapy in Clients' Trajectories Across Contexts , 2001 .

[25]  Seung Hee Ho,et al.  Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in home health services for the elderly , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  Hospital in the home: a randomised controlled trial. , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[27]  D. Zakaria,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of a telephone intervention by nurses to provide information and support to patients and their partners after elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery: effects of anxiety. , 2002, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[28]  A. Norberg,et al.  A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[29]  F. Rapport Hermeneutic phenomenology: the science of interpretation of texts , 2005 .

[30]  George Demiris,et al.  Telehomecare: quality, perception, satisfaction. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.