Internet-Based Photoaging Within Australian Pharmacies to Promote Smoking Cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Tobacco smoking leads to death or disability and a drain on national resources. The literature suggests that cigarette smoking continues to be a major modifiable risk factor for a variety of diseases and that smokers aged 18-30 years are relatively resistant to antismoking messages due to their widely held belief that they will not be lifelong smokers. Objective To conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a computer-generated photoaging intervention to promote smoking cessation among young adult smokers within a community pharmacy setting. Methods A trial was designed with 80% power based on the effect size observed in a published pilot study; 160 subjects were recruited (80 allocated to the control group and 80 to the intervention group) from 8 metropolitan community pharmacies located around Perth city center in Western Australia. All participants received standardized smoking cessation advice. The intervention group participants were also digitally photoaged by using the Internet-based APRIL Face Aging software so they could preview images of themselves as a lifelong smoker and as a nonsmoker. Due to the nature of the intervention, the participants and researcher could not be blinded to the study. The main outcome measure was quit attempts at 6-month follow-up, both self-reported and biochemically validated through testing for carbon monoxide (CO), and nicotine dependence assessed via the Fagerström scale. Results At 6-month follow-up, 5 of 80 control group participants (6.3%) suggested they had quit smoking, but only 1 of 80 control group participants (1.3%) consented to, and was confirmed by, CO validation. In the intervention group, 22 of 80 participants (27.5%) reported quitting, with 11 of 80 participants (13.8%) confirmed by CO testing. This difference in biochemically confirmed quit attempts was statistically significant (χ2 1=9.0, P=.003). A repeated measures analysis suggested the average intervention group smoking dependence score had also significantly dropped compared to control participants (P<.001). These differences remained statistically significant after adjustment for small differences in gender distribution and nicotine dependence between the groups. The mean cost of implementing the intervention was estimated at AU $5.79 per participant. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was AU $46 per additional quitter. The mean cost that participants indicated they were willing to pay for the digital aging service was AU $20.25 (SD 15.32). Conclusions Demonstrating the detrimental effects on facial physical appearance by using a computer-generated simulation may be both effective and cost-effective at persuading young adult smokers to quit. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000885291; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12609000885291 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6F2kMt3kC)

[1]  V. White,et al.  Smoking behaviours of Australian secondary students in 2005 , 2006 .

[2]  Alireza Ahmadvand CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions , 2011 .

[3]  S. Wilson Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[4]  R. Davey,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of an appearance-related smoking intervention. , 2011, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  G. Fong,et al.  Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[6]  M. Jiwa,et al.  Photoaging Intervention (PAINT): A proposal for a randomised controlled trial in Australian Primary Care , 2008 .

[7]  Johan P Mackenbach,et al.  Educational differences in the intention to stop smoking: explanations based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. , 2004, European journal of public health.

[8]  K. Juel,et al.  Abstention from smoking extends life and compresses morbidity: a population based study of health expectancy among smokers and never smokers in Denmark , 2001, Tobacco control.

[9]  K. Phillips The broken mirror : understanding and treating body dysmorphic disorder , 1996 .

[10]  Grazyna Adamiak,et al.  Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd ed , 2006 .

[11]  R. Davey,et al.  Women smokers' experiences of an age-appearance anti-smoking intervention: a qualitative study. , 2011, British journal of health psychology.

[12]  K. Cummings,et al.  “At Face Value”: age progression software provides personalised demonstration of the effects of smoking on appearance , 2003, Tobacco control.

[13]  M. Raw,et al.  Improving smoking cessation approaches at the individual level , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[14]  L. Stead,et al.  Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  R. Campbell,et al.  Long-term smoking relapse: a study using the british household panel survey. , 2010, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[16]  A. Tverdal,et al.  Health consequences of smoking 1–4 cigarettes per day , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[17]  M. Mcgrath Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1998 .

[18]  L. Wood,et al.  Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions: review of evidence and implications for best practice in Australian health care settings , 2003, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[19]  J. Stockman,et al.  Mortality in Relation to Smoking: 50 Years' Observations on Male British Doctors , 2006 .

[20]  W. Groot,et al.  Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Smoking Cessation: Standardizing the Cost-Effectiveness , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  J. Dratva,et al.  Aging Images as a Motivational Trigger for Smoking Cessation in Young Women , 2010, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[22]  W. Velicer,et al.  Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. , 2002, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[23]  E. Krall,et al.  Smoking relapse after 2 years of abstinence: findings from the VA Normative Aging Study. , 2002, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[24]  J. Matthews,et al.  The Quit Benefits Model: a Markov model for assessing the health benefits and health care cost savings of quitting smoking , 2007, Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E.

[25]  P M Barton,et al.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2002, Health technology assessment.

[26]  P. Kraft,et al.  Happy ending: a randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. , 2008, Addiction.