The visual field following acute primary angle closure.

PURPOSE To determine the frequency and type of visual field loss six months after an episode of acute primary angle closure (APAC), and to identify risk factors for the development of such field loss. METHODS This was a cross sectional observational study. All patients who suffered from an episode of APAC at two Singapore hospitals over a one-year period underwent static automated threshold perimetry six months after presentation. RESULTS 38% of (29) patients with APAC have significant visual field defects six months after the acute episode. The majority of those with abnormal fields had hemifield defects, consistent with nerve fiber bundle pattern loss. Those with pre-existing chronic glaucoma or who develop a rise in intraocular pressure during follow-up are at risk of visual field loss. The risk of visual field loss is also significant if the duration of symptoms exceeds 7 days. CONCLUSIONS The frequency of visual field loss at 6 months after APAC was low at only 38%. As the majority of eyes have no evidence of detectable functional damage developing as a consequence of the acute episode, APAC may not be blinding if treated promptly and adequately.

[1]  K. Poh,et al.  Clinical course and outcome of primary acute angle-closure glaucoma in Singapore. , 1997, Singapore medical journal.

[2]  A. Sommer,et al.  Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[3]  J Katz,et al.  Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Lowe.  Clinical types of primary angle closure glaucoma. , 1988, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  A Sommer,et al.  Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  A Sommer,et al.  Automated differential threshold perimetry for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  H A Quigley,et al.  A comparison of Peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. , 1985, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Ingram,et al.  Acute glaucoma: results of treatment by bilateral simultaneous iridectomy, now without admission to hospital. , 1983, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Hillman.  Acute closed-angle glaucoma: an investigation into the effect of delay in treatment. , 1979, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  S. Drance,et al.  The visual field and nerve head in angle-closure glaucoma. A comparison of the effects of acute and chronic angle closure. , 1975, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Y. Kitazawa,et al.  Visual field changes in primary angle closure glaucoma , 1975 .

[12]  E. Mcclure,et al.  Pattern of visual damage after acute angle-closure glaucoma. , 1974, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.