The Impact of the Monographs Crisis on the Field of Communication

Abstract This study replicates and extends Yates and Chapman's [(2007), Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 26(1), 39–51] study of references from Communication Monographs, Communication Research, and Journal of Communication for the years 2010 and 2015 to draw further conclusions on the use of monographs in journal literature in the field of communication. Results show that the use of monographs in these journals has been outpaced by references to journal articles by a ratio of 5 to 1. The references were further analyzed by date and publisher. The authors then selected a random sample of the monographs cited in the journals to explore the availability of these monographs in electronic format and found that many are available as ebooks, particularly the more recent titles. The authors also examined the references from a collection of scholarly books in communication from 2005, 2010, and 2015 and found that the use of monographs may be declining slightly. The most notable trend in these references was the increase in the number of references to items in other formats such as film, television, comic books, and websites. The authors conclude that the monographs crisis is indeed affecting citation patterns in the field of communication.

[1]  Cinzia Padovani,et al.  A Fatal Attraction: Public Television and Politics in Italy , 2004 .

[2]  David Myers,et al.  Play Redux: The Form of Computer Games , 2010 .

[3]  Jack Fuller,et al.  What Is Happening to News: The Information Explosion and the Crisis in Journalism , 2010 .

[4]  Peter Williams,et al.  The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[5]  Brian Upton.  The Aesthetic of Play , 2015 .

[6]  Rikk Mulligan.  The Transformation of Scholarly Communications, Part III: Long-Form Scholarship: Monographs and Scholarly Books , 2015 .

[7]  A. Durant.  Meaning in the Media: Discourse, Controversy and Debate , 2010 .

[8]  Allen Meek.  Trauma and Media: Theories, Histories, and Images , 2009 .

[9]  Jake Batsell,et al.  Engaged Journalism: Connecting with Digitally Empowered News Audiences , 2015 .

[10]  Phil Pochoda,et al.  The big one: The epistemic system break in scholarly monograph publishing , 2013, New Media Soc..

[11]  Jesper Juul,et al.  A Casual Revolution: Reinventing Video Games and Their Players , 2009 .

[12]  Tina M. Neville,et al.  Evaluating Scholarly Book Publishers—A Case Study in the Field of Journalism , 2014 .

[13]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005 , 2008 .

[14]  M. Baum,et al.  War Stories: The Causes and Consequences of Public Views of War , 2010 .

[15]  Diana Ritter.  Frank J. Macke, The Experience of Human Communication: Body, Flesh, and Relationship , 2017 .

[16]  Rong Tang.  Citation Characteristics and Intellectual Acceptance of Scholarly Monographs , 2008 .

[17]  Richard Jackson,et al.  Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism , 2005 .

[18]  D. Woolwine.  Collection Development in the Humanities and Social Sciences in a Transitional Age: Deaccession of Print Items , 2014 .

[19]  R. Stahl.  Militainment, Inc.: War, Media, and Popular Culture , 2009 .

[20]  Vincent Manzerolle.  Media Convergence: The Three Degrees of Network, Mass and Interpersonal Communication , 2013 .

[21]  Karen Chapman,et al.  An Examination of the Use of Monographs in the Communication Journal Literature , 2007 .

[22]  Lisa Parks.  Cultures in Orbit: Satellites and the Televisual , 2005 .

[23]  Mette Mortensen.  Journalism and Eyewitness Images: Digital Media, Participation, and Conflict , 2014 .

[24]  Charlene Kellsey,et al.  Overlap between Humanities Faculty Citation and Library Monograph Collections, 2004-2009 , 2012, Coll. Res. Libr..

[25]  Marsha F. Cassidy.  What Women Watched: Daytime Television in the 1950s , 2005 .

[26]  J. R. Stevens.  Captain America, Masculinity, and Violence: The Evolution of a National Icon , 2015 .

[27]  I. C. A. Riley.  Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change , 2012 .

[28]  Elisabeth A. Jones,et al.  Monographic Purchasing Trends in Academic Libraries: Did the ‘Serials Crisis’ Really Destroy the University Press? , 2014 .

[29]  P. Strevens.  Iii , 1985 .