Optimal Remediation Policy Selection under General Conditions

A new simulation-optimization model has been developed for the optimal design of ground-water remediation systems under a variety of field conditions. The model couples genetic algorithm (G A), a global search technique inspired by biological evolution, with MODFLOW and MT3D, and two commonly used ground-water flow and solute transport codes. The model allows for multiple management periods in which optimal pumping/injection rates vary with time to reflect the changes in the flow and transport conditions during the remediation process. The objective function of the model incorporates multiple cost terms including the drilling cost, the installation cost, and the costs to extract and treat the contaminated ground water. The simulation-optimization model is first applied to a typical two-dimensional pump-and-treat example with one and three management periods to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the new model. The model is then applied to a large-scale three-dimensional field problem to determine the minimum pumping needed to contain an existing contaminant plume. The optimal solution as determined in this study is compared with a previous solution based on trial-and-error selection.

[1]  Virginia M. Johnson,et al.  Location Analysis in Ground‐Water Remediation Using Neural Networks , 1995 .

[2]  C. Shoemaker,et al.  Optimal time-varying pumping rates for groundwater remediation: Application of a constrained optimal control algorithm , 1992 .

[3]  D. McKinney,et al.  Approximate Mixed‐Integer Nonlinear Programming Methods for Optimal Aquifer Remediation Design , 1995 .

[4]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty , 1987 .

[5]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity: From data to design , 1989 .

[6]  C. Zheng.  A Modular Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reaction of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems , 1990 .

[7]  Steven M. Gorelick,et al.  Large scale nonlinear deterministic and stochastic optimization: Formulations involving simulation of subsurface contamination , 1990, Math. Program..

[8]  G. Pinder,et al.  Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory: 2. Analysis of a field site , 1988 .

[9]  C. Shoemaker,et al.  Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods , 1992 .

[10]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling , 1994 .

[11]  Charles S. Sawyer,et al.  Groundwater Remediation Design Using a Three‐Dimensional Simulation Model and Mixed‐Integer Programming , 1995 .

[12]  John M. Mulvey,et al.  Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory: 1. Model development , 1988 .

[13]  S. Ranjithan,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem , 1994 .

[14]  D. McKinney,et al.  Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models , 1994 .

[15]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Optimal groundwater remediation with well location as a decision variable: Model development , 1994 .

[16]  S. Gorelick.  A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods , 1983 .

[17]  J. Eheart,et al.  Using Genetic Algorithms to Solve a Multiobjective Groundwater Monitoring Problem , 1995 .

[18]  P. Gill,et al.  Aquifer Reclamation Design: The Use of Contaminant Transport Simulation Combined With Nonlinear Programing , 1984 .

[19]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  A generalized finite-difference formulation for the U.S. Geological Survey modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1992 .