Cyclical Behavior of Concrete-Encased Composite Frame Joints with High Strength Concrete

This paper presents an application of high strength concrete to concrete-encased composite frame building based on an experimental program. The work emphasized joints behavior under reverse cyclic loading caused by earthquakes to provide information for seismic design. To investigate the internal mechanisms and seismic performance, cyclic loading tests were carried out on five half-scale interior joints. Two design variables were addressed in the research: concrete strength and axial column load. Frame joints performance including crack pattern, failure mode, deformation, ductility, strain distribution, and energy dissipation capacity was investigated. It was found that all joint specimens behaved in a manner with joint panel shear failure. Using high strength concrete increased the joint strength and had relatively little effect on the stiffness and ductility. The axial column load helped the joint strength by better mobilizing the outer part of the joint, but it had an obvious influence on the ductility and energy-dissipating capacity, which can be improved by providing enough transverse reinforcement. A typical crack pattern was also provided which can well reflect mechanical character and damage process. This research should contribute to the future engineering applications of high strength concrete to concrete-encased composite structure.

[2]  J. R. Carmona,et al.  Shape and Size Effects on the Compressive Strength of High-strength Concrete , 2008 .

[3]  Jian-Sheng Fan,et al.  Experimental Study on the Seismic Performance of 3D Joints between Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Columns and Composite Beams , 2014 .

[4]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Overview of U.S.–Japan Research on the Seismic Design of Composite Reinforced Concrete and Steel Moment Frame Structures , 2004 .

[5]  Z. Tao,et al.  Behaviour of composite joints with concrete encased CFST columns under cyclic loading: Experiments , 2014 .

[6]  N. E. Shanmugam,et al.  State of the art report on steel–concrete composite columns , 2001 .

[7]  Cheng-Chih Chen,et al.  Analytical model for predicting axial capacity and behavior of concrete encased steel composite stub columns , 2006 .

[8]  N. Iyer,et al.  Estimation of fracture properties for high strength and ultra high strength concrete beams and size effect , 2013 .

[9]  Roberto Realfonzo,et al.  Cyclic behavior of RC beam-column joints strengthened with FRP systems , 2014 .

[10]  Yong Wang,et al.  An experimental study of relative structural fire behaviour and robustness of different types of steel joint in restrained steel frames , 2011 .

[11]  Dennis Lam,et al.  Behaviour of normal and high strength concrete-filled compact steel tube circular stub columns , 2006 .

[12]  I. Imran,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF CONFINED LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE SUBJECTED TO CONCENTRIC COMPRESSION , 2012 .

[13]  Young-Kyu Ju,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of New Concrete Encased Steel Composite Beam to Steel Column Joint , 2007 .

[14]  A. Elwi,et al.  Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength concrete , 2013 .

[15]  G. Moriconi,et al.  The influence of recycled concrete aggregates on the behavior of beam–column joints under cyclic loading , 2014 .

[16]  Jian-Sheng Fan,et al.  Seismic behavior of steel reinforced concrete column–steel truss beam hybrid joints , 2013 .

[17]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Steel-Fiber Reinforced Concrete Interior Beam-Column Joints , 1995 .

[18]  Chen Ge Research advances of steel-concrete composite structural systems , 2010 .

[19]  P. Bowen,et al.  Changes in portlandite morphology with solvent composition: Atomistic simulations and experiment , 2011 .

[20]  Caihua Chen,et al.  Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Full Encased Steel-Concrete Composite Columns , 2014 .