Modified Numerals as Post-Suppositions

The paper provides a compositional account of cumulative readings with non-increasing modified numerals (aka van Benthem's puzzle), e.g., Exactly three boys saw exactly five movies. The main proposal is that modified numerals make two kinds of semantic contributions. Their asserted/at-issue contribution is a maximization operator that introduces the maximal set of entities that satisfies their restrictor and nuclear scope. The second contribution is a post-supposition, i.e., a cardinality constraint that needs to be satisfied relative to the context that results after the at-issue meaning is evaluated. We take contexts to be sets of variable assignments relative to which quantificational expressions are interpreted and which are updated as a result of their interpretation.

[1]  David Lewis,et al.  Formal semantics of Natural Language: Adverbs of quantification , 2008 .

[2]  Godehard Link.  The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[3]  Rick Nouwen,et al.  Plural pronominal anaphora in context , 2003 .

[4]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Modal subordination, anaphora, and distributivity , 1990 .

[5]  J. Benthem.  Essays in Logical Semantics , 1986 .

[6]  Craige Roberts.  Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse , 1989 .

[7]  M. Braine,et al.  What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? , 1996, Cognition.

[8]  Paul Dekker,et al.  A multi-dimensional treatment of quantification in extraordinary English , 2008 .

[9]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Reciprocity and Cumulative Predication , 1998 .

[10]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Decomposing Modal Quantification , 2010, J. Semant..

[11]  B. Schein.  Plurals and Events , 1994 .

[12]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  STRUCTURED NOMINAL AND MODAL REFERENCE , 2008 .

[13]  L. McNally.  Existential Sentences without Existential Quantification , 1998 .

[14]  David Gil,et al.  Quantifier scope, linguistic variation, and natural language semantics , 1982 .

[15]  Carla Umbach.  Why Do Modified Numerals Resist a Referential Interpretation , 2005 .

[16]  Donka F. Farkas,et al.  Varieties of Indefinites , 2002 .

[17]  H. W. Zeevat.  Applying an Exhaustivity Operator in Update Semantics, in: Ellipsis, Tense and Questions (Hans Kamp, ed.) , 1994 .

[18]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Donkey pluralities: plural information states versus non-atomic individuals , 2008 .

[19]  I. Heim.  Degree Operators and Scope , 2000 .

[20]  M. Krifka.  At least some Determiners aren ’ t Determiners , 1999 .

[21]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  The Event Argument and the Semantics of Verbs , 2002 .

[22]  Jakub Dotlačil,et al.  Anaphora and distributivity : a study of same, different, reciprocals and others , 2010 .

[23]  B. Geurts,et al.  At least et al: The semantic of scalar modifiers , 2007 .

[24]  Fred Landman,et al.  Events And Plurality , 2000 .

[25]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Indefinites between Predication and Reference , 1999 .

[26]  Linton Wang,et al.  Dynamics of plurality in quantification and anaphora , 2005 .

[27]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Structured anaphora to quantifier domains , 2010, Inf. Comput..

[28]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[29]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Discourse Referents , 1969, COLING.

[30]  R. Nouwen.  Two kinds of modified numerals , 2010 .

[31]  Sven Lauer,et al.  Free Relatives With -ever: Meaning And Use. , 2009 .

[32]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[33]  Daniel Büring,et al.  The Least at least Can Do , 2008 .

[34]  Robert A.M. van Rooyy.  Modal Subordination in Questions , 2007 .

[35]  M. H. van den Berg,et al.  Some aspects of the internal structure of discourse. The dynamics of nominal anaphora , 1996 .

[36]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  Distributivity, Collectivity, and Cumulativity in Terms of (In)dependence and Maximality , 2011, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[37]  Anna Szabolcsi.  Strategies for Scope Taking , 1997 .

[38]  G. Evans.  Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (l) , 1977, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

[39]  G. Chierchia,et al.  The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship between Semantics and Pragmatics , 2008 .

[40]  Lucas Champollion,et al.  Cumulative Readings of Every Do Not Provide Evidence for Events and Thematic Roles , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[41]  I. Willis.  Pronouns , 2004, Encyclopedia of Queer Studies in Education.

[42]  Jessica Rett,et al.  Equatives, Measure Phrases and NPIs , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.