Wrist-worn triaxial accelerometry predicts the energy expenditure of non-vigorous daily physical activities.

OBJECTIVES Triaxial accelerometry is commonly used to estimate oxygen uptake (VO2) and energy expenditure in health and fitness studies. We tested the correlation of a triaxial accelerometer in terms of a summation of vector magnitudes with gravity subtracted (SVMgs) and measured VO2 for different daily physical activities. DESIGN Original research, cross-sectional. METHODS Twenty volunteers wore a triaxial accelerometer on both wrists while performing 12 assigned daily physical activities for 6min for each activity. The VO2 was determined by indirect calorimetry using a portable metabolic measurement system. The last 3min of each activity was assumed to represent steady-state. The VO2 measured during these periods was averaged and converted into metabolic equivalents (METs). RESULTS The range of VO2 for all activities was 0.18-3.2L/min (0.8-12.2 METs). Significant differences in SVMgs existed between accelerometer placements on the dominant (120.9±8.7gmin) versus non-dominant hand (99.9±6.8gmin; P=0.016) for the lowest levels of physical activity defined as <1.5 METs. Piecewise linear regression model using 6 METs as the transition point showed similar significant correlations for the non-dominant wrist (r2=0.85; P<0.001) and the dominant wrist (r2=0.86; P<0.001). Using the non-dominant wrist below 6 METs, the slope of the relationship between SVMgs and METs was 105.3±4.3 (95% CI 96.9 to 113.7) indicating an increase in SVMgs of approximately 100 units for every MET increase in oxygen uptake. CONCLUSIONS Wrist-worn triaxial accelerometry reliably predicted energy expenditure during common physical activities <6 METs. More consistent correlations were found when the accelerometer was worn on the non-dominant wrist rather than the dominant wrist.

[1]  L. Waite,et al.  Wrist Accelerometry in the Health, Functional, and Social Assessment of Older Adults , 2016, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  Thomas W. Storer,et al.  Exercise Testing and Interpretation: A Practical Approach , 2001 .

[3]  Tina L Hurst,et al.  Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  A. Bauman,et al.  Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. , 2007, Circulation.

[7]  Mohanraj Karunanithi,et al.  Review of accelerometry for determining daily activity among elderly patients. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Gaynor Parfitt,et al.  Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[10]  Kate Lyden,et al.  Accuracy of accelerometer regression models in predicting energy expenditure and METs in children and youth. , 2012, Pediatric exercise science.

[11]  Søren Brage,et al.  Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application , 2007, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[12]  Michael W. Beets,et al.  Measurement of physical activity in older adult interventions: a systematic review , 2015, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[13]  Russell R. Pate,et al.  The Evolving Definition of "Sedentary" , 2008, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[14]  Lucas J Carr,et al.  Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours". , 2012, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[15]  J. Lacour,et al.  Simultaneous Validation of Ten Physical Activity Questionnaires in Older Men: A Doubly Labeled Water Study , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  David R Bassett,et al.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  A. Bauman,et al.  Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003. , 2004, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[18]  Claudio R Nigg,et al.  Establishing and evaluating wrist cutpoints for the GENEActiv accelerometer in youth. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  J. Myers,et al.  Exercise and physical activity: clinical outcomes and applications. , 2010, Circulation.

[20]  K. Eckert,et al.  Comparison of physical activity questionnaires for the elderly with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) – an analysis of content , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[21]  Roy J. Shephard,et al.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[22]  Patty S. Freedson,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[23]  R. Eston,et al.  Activity classification using the GENEA: optimum sampling frequency and number of axes. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.