A Summary Catalogue of Microbial Drinking Water Tests for Low and Medium Resource Settings

Microbial drinking-water quality testing plays an essential role in measures to protect public health. However, such testing remains a significant challenge where resources are limited. With a wide variety of tests available, researchers and practitioners have expressed difficulties in selecting the most appropriate test(s) for a particular budget, application and setting. To assist the selection process we identified the characteristics associated with low and medium resource settings and we specified the basic information that is needed for different forms of water quality monitoring. We then searched for available faecal indicator bacteria tests and collated this information. In total 44 tests have been identified, 18 of which yield a presence/absence result and 26 of which provide enumeration of bacterial concentration. The suitability of each test is assessed for use in the three settings. The cost per test was found to vary from $0.60 to $5.00 for a presence/absence test and from $0.50 to $7.50 for a quantitative format, though it is likely to be only a small component of the overall costs of testing. This article presents the first comprehensive catalogue of the characteristics of available and emerging low-cost tests for faecal indicator bacteria. It will be of value to organizations responsible for monitoring national water quality, water service providers, researchers and policy makers in selecting water quality tests appropriate for a given setting and application.

[1]  J. Ballance,et al.  Water quality monitoring , 2013 .

[2]  Stephen W. Gundry,et al.  Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking-water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: lessons from five countries. , 2012, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[3]  Jamie Bartram,et al.  Global Access to Safe Water: Accounting for Water Quality and the Resulting Impact on MDG Progress , 2012, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  Steve Pedley,et al.  The H2S test versus standard indicator bacteria tests for faecal contamination of water: systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2012, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[5]  M. Sobsey,et al.  Ambient‐temperature incubation for the field detection of Escherichia coli in drinking water , 2011, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  J. Perry,et al.  Enzymatic substrates in microbiology. , 2009, Journal of microbiological methods.

[7]  J. Schauer,et al.  A comparison of ten USEPA approved total coliform/E. coli tests. , 2007, Journal of water and health.

[8]  Lorna Fewtrell,et al.  Water safety plans: managing drinking-water quality from catchment to consumer , 2005 .

[9]  S. House,et al.  Emergency water sources: Guidelines for selection and treatment [3rd ed.] , 2004 .

[10]  Robert J. Blodgett,et al.  FDA's preferred MPN methods for standard, large or unusual tests, with a spreadsheet , 2003 .

[11]  A. Prescott,et al.  Surveillance and investigation of contamination incidents and waterborne outbreaks , 2003 .

[12]  Pierre Servais,et al.  Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches. , 2002, Journal of microbiological methods.

[13]  S. Edberg,et al.  Advances in the bacteriology of the coliform group: their suitability as markers of microbial water safety. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[14]  M. Manafi.  New developments in chromogenic and fluorogenic culture media. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[15]  Richard Ballance,et al.  Water Quality Monitoring : A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes , 1998 .

[16]  S. House,et al.  Emergency water sources: guidelines for selection and treatment trainer support notes , 1998 .

[17]  K S Manja,et al.  A simple field test for the detection of faecal pollution in drinking water. , 1982, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[18]  J. Clark.  A presence-absence (P-A) test providing sensitive and inexpensive detection of coliforms, fecal coliforms, and fecal streptococci in municipal drinking water supplies. , 1968, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[19]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the "most probable number". , 1950, Biometrics.