Dynamic range improvement in NMR imaging using phase scrambling

Abstract Data collection efficiency in NMR imaging is impaired if the dynamic range of the receiver system is limited in comparison with that of the observed signal. This situation may occur in high-resolution proton imaging of large objects at high magnetic field strengths. The efficiency with which information is received can be increased by reducing the peak amplitude of the spin response by varying the phase distribution of the excited spins. This phase scrambling technique may be implemented using tailored RF excitation or by dephasing using nonlinear magnetic field gradients and can be applied in all dimensions of an acquired data set, providing a significant reduction in the dynamic range requirements of the detection electronics. Experimental results using 2D Fourier imaging have obtained up to 25 dB reduction in peak signal intensities. Image signal-to-noise ratios improved up to a factor of 6, with actual values dependent on experimental conditions. Simulation studies show that computational noise introduced during Fourier transformation is significantly reduced when phase scrambling is employed.

[1]  J. Ferretti,et al.  Selection of optimum parameters for pulse Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance , 1979 .

[2]  W. Edelstein,et al.  Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging. , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Peter Mansfield,et al.  Fast scan proton density imaging by NMR , 1976 .

[4]  R. Bracewell.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[5]  H. Hill,et al.  Fourier synthesized excitation of nuclear magnetic resonance with application to homonuclear decoupling and solvent line suppression , 1973 .

[6]  A. Maudsley.  Fourier imaging using rf phase encoding , 1986, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[7]  J. Tukey,et al.  An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series , 1965 .

[8]  Tran-Thong,et al.  Fixed-point fast Fourier transform error analysis , 1976 .

[9]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  Sensitivity and performance time in NMR imaging , 1979 .

[10]  Andrew A. Maudsley,et al.  Sensitivity in fourier imaging , 1986 .

[11]  J. Klauder,et al.  The theory and design of chirp radars , 1960 .

[12]  Bede Liu,et al.  Accumulation of Round-Off Error in Fast Fourier Transforms , 1970, JACM.

[13]  P. Mansfield.  Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[14]  J. Hutchison,et al.  Three-dimensional NMR imaging using selective excitation , 1978 .

[15]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  Magnetic resonance with stochastic excitation , 1970 .

[16]  J. Lindon,et al.  Digitisation and data processing in Fourier transform NMR , 1980 .

[17]  J. Cooper.  Computers in NMR. II. experimental investigation of noise and dynamic range in the fourier transform process , 1976 .

[18]  V. Rao,et al.  Vector radix FFT error analysis , 1982 .

[19]  S. K. Hilal,et al.  Electronics and Instrumentation for NMR Imaging , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  D Kunz,et al.  Frequency‐modulated radiofrequency pulses in spin‐echo and stimulated‐echo experiments , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  P. Welch.  A fixed-point fast Fourier transform error analysis , 1969 .