Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts.

Because of the heterogeneity of natural landscapes, animals have to move through various types of areas that are more or less suitable with respect to their current needs. The locations of the profitable places actually used, which may be only a subset of the whole set of suitable areas available, are usually unknown, but can be inferred from movement analysis by assuming that these places correspond to the limited areas where the animals spend more time than elsewhere. Identifying these intensively used areas makes it possible, through subsequent analyses, to address both how they are distributed with respect to key habitat features, and the underlying behavioral mechanisms used to find these areas and capitalize on such habitats. We critically reviewed the few previously published methods to detect changes in movement behavior likely to occur when an animal enters a profitable place. As all of them appeared to be too narrowly tuned to specific situations, we designed a new, easy-to-use method based on the time spent in the vicinity of successive path locations. We used computer simulations to show that our method is both quite general and robust to noisy data.

[1]  Helen Bailey,et al.  Quantitative analysis of bottlenose dolphin movement patterns and their relationship with foraging. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[2]  Kiyoshi Nakamuta,et al.  Mechanism of the switchover from extensive to area-concentrated search behaviour of the ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata bruckii , 1985 .

[3]  James Smith,et al.  The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes , 1974 .

[4]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Detecting an orientation component in animal paths when the preferred direction is individual-dependent. , 2006, Ecology.

[5]  S. Benhamou,et al.  Spatial analysis of animals' movements using a correlated random walk model* , 1988 .

[6]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  At-sea distribution and scale-dependent foraging behaviour of petrels and albatrosses: a comparative study. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behaviour in a continuous patchy environment* , 1992 .

[8]  Geoffrey Parker,et al.  Animal Behavior as a Strategy Optimizer: Evolution of Resource Assessment Strategies and Optimal Emigration Thresholds , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[9]  James Smith,et al.  The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. Ii: the Adaptiveness of the Search Patterns , 1974 .

[10]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Fractal Analyses of Animal Movement: A Critique , 1996 .

[11]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[12]  C. Banks The behaviour of individual coccinellid larvae on plants , 1957 .

[13]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[14]  B. E. Eckbo,et al.  Appendix , 1826, Epilepsy Research.

[15]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  S. Benhamou,et al.  How animals use their environment: a new look at kinesis , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  P. Knoppien,et al.  Predators with two modes of searching: A mathematical model* , 1985 .

[18]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[19]  Torkild Tveraa,et al.  USING FIRST‐PASSAGE TIME IN THE ANALYSIS OF AREA‐RESTRICTED SEARCH AND HABITAT SELECTION , 2003 .

[20]  Keith D. Farnsworth,et al.  Animal foraging from an individual perspective: an object orientated model , 1998 .

[21]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Spatial memory and searching efficiency , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[23]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring resource distributions from Atlantic bluefin tuna movements: an analysis based on net displacement and length of track. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  Fractal landscape method: an alternative approach to measuring area-restricted searching behavior , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Horst Bornemann,et al.  All at sea with animal tracks; methodological and analytical solutions for the resolution of movement , 2007 .

[26]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Scale‐dependent habitat use in a long‐ranging central place predator , 2005 .

[27]  M. Lavielle Detection of multiple changes in a sequence of dependent variables , 1999 .

[28]  Franck Picard Process segmentation/clustering. Application to the analysis of CGH microarray data. , 2005 .

[29]  Marc Lavielle,et al.  Using penalized contrasts for the change-point problem , 2005, Signal Process..

[30]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[31]  Bernard Dacorogna,et al.  Optimal Foraging on Arbitrary Food Distributions and the Definition of Habitat Patches , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  Identifying leatherback turtle foraging behaviour from satellite telemetry using a switching state-space model , 2007 .

[33]  P. Fauchald,et al.  Foraging in a Hierarchical Patch System , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  ROBUST STATE-SPACE MODELING OF ANIMAL MOVEMENT DATA , 2005 .

[35]  K D Farnsworth,et al.  How Do Grazers Achieve Their Distribution? A Continuum of Models from Random Diffusion to the Ideal Free Distribution Using Biased Random Walks , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Translating Foraging Movements in Heterogeneous Environments into the Spatial Distribution of Foragers , 1991 .

[37]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  State-space models of individual animal movement. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[39]  David Pinaud,et al.  Quantifying search effort of moving animals at several spatial scales using first‐passage time analysis: effect of the structure of environment and tracking systems , 2007 .

[40]  J. Staddon,et al.  Searching for Cryptic Prey: The Effect of Search Rate , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[41]  G. Thomas,et al.  The influences of encountering a food object on subsequent searching behaviour in Gasterosteus aculeatus L , 1974 .

[42]  Graham C. Hickman,et al.  Feeding ecology and foraging behaviour of the Namib Desert golden mole, Eremitalpa granti namibensis (Chrysochloridae) , 1990 .

[43]  Vilis O. Nams,et al.  Using animal movement paths to measure response to spatial scale , 2005, Oecologia.

[44]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Spatial learning and discrimination of food patches in the European badger (Meles meles L.) , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  S. Goldhor Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[46]  S. Benhamou How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  Grayham E. Mizon,et al.  Model selection procedures , 2005 .

[48]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  FAD: Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  An analysis of movements of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in its home range , 1991, Behavioural Processes.

[50]  S. Benhamou HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK , 2007 .