Multidimensional vector model of stimulus-response compatibility.

The present study proposes and examines the multidimensional vector (MDV) model framework as a modeling schema for choice response times. MDV extends the Thurstonian model, as well as signal detection theory, to classification tasks by taking into account the influence of response properties on stimulus discrimination. It is capable of accounting for stimulus-response compatibility, which is known to be an influential task variable determining choice-reaction performance but has not been considered in previous mathematical modeling efforts. Specific MDV models were developed for 5 experiments using the Simon task, for which stimulus location is task irrelevant, to examine the validity of model assumptions and illustrate characteristic behaviors of model parameters. The MDV models accounted for the experimental data to a remarkable degree, demonstrating the adequacy of the framework as a general schema for modeling the latency of choice performance. Some modeling issues involved in the MDV model framework are discussed.

[1]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[2]  U. Ansorge,et al.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Patrick Slater,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL PREFERENCES , 1960 .

[5]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Kenneth Mullen,et al.  A multidimensional stochastic theory of similiarity , 1988 .

[7]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Geert De Soete,et al.  A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model , 1983 .

[9]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[10]  Carlo Umilta,et al.  Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  L. Tucker,et al.  An individual differences model for multidimensional scaling , 1963 .

[12]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[13]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[14]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[15]  Allen Newell,et al.  Elements of a theory of human problem solving. , 1958 .

[16]  Y. Guiard,et al.  The lateral coding of rotations: a study of the simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  Compatibility Effects in the Assignment of Symbolic Stimuli to Discrete Finger Responses , 1985 .

[18]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[19]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[20]  W. Kunde,et al.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Susana Ruiz Fernández,et al.  Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[23]  M. Goodale Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1995 .

[24]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook Practical Genetic Algorithms (2nd ed.): Randy L. Haupt and Sue Ellen Haupt , 2005 .

[25]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Grice-representability of response time distribution families , 1993 .

[26]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[27]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Agnieszka Wykowska,et al.  How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Chen-hui Lu Correspondence effects for irrelevant information in choice-reaction tasks: Characterizing the stimulus-response relations and the processing dynamics , 1997 .

[30]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation , 2003 .

[31]  J. R. Simon,et al.  CHOICE REACTION TIME AS A FUNCTION OF ANGULAR STIMULUS-RESPONSE CORRESPONDENCE AND AGE , 1963 .

[32]  T. Zandt,et al.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Jaewun Cho,et al.  A stochastic multidimensional scaling vector threshold model for the spatial representation of “pick any/n” data , 1989 .

[34]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[35]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[36]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility: Editors' introduction , 1997 .

[37]  S. Kornblum,et al.  A Parallel Distributed Processing Model of Stimulus–Stimulus and Stimulus–Response Compatibility , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Kenneth Mullen,et al.  A simple multivariate probabilistic model for preferential and triadic choices , 1991 .

[39]  Douglas Vickers,et al.  Dynamic Models of Simple Judgments: I. Properties of a Self-Regulating Accumulator Module , 1998 .

[40]  G. Logan Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[42]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application , 2006 .

[43]  W. Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[44]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[45]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Probabilistic, multidimensional unfolding analysis , 1974 .

[46]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1952 .

[47]  Wolfgang Gaul,et al.  Analysis of choice behaviour via probabilistic ideal point and vector models , 1986 .

[48]  B Hommel,et al.  The role of attention for the Simon effect , 1993, Psychological research.

[49]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[50]  Maddox Wt,et al.  Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. , 1996 .

[51]  Gustav Theodor Fechner,et al.  Elements of psychophysics , 1966 .

[52]  R. Shepard Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[53]  H. Müller,et al.  Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? , 2006 .

[54]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry , 2011 .

[55]  U. Ansorge,et al.  The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space , 1957 .

[58]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[60]  Geert De Soete,et al.  The Wandering Ideal Point Model: A Probabilistic Multidimensional Unfolding Model for Paired Comparisons Data , 1986 .

[61]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  Randy L. Haupt,et al.  Practical Genetic Algorithms , 1998 .

[63]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Probabilistic multidimensional scaling: Complete and incomplete data , 1983 .

[64]  B. Murdock An analysis of the strength-latency relationship , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[65]  William B. Michael,et al.  Psychological Scaling: Theory and Applications , 1961 .

[66]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[67]  G. Logan The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. , 1996, Psychological review.

[68]  W T Maddox,et al.  Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  B. Hommel Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[70]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[71]  Motonori Yamaguchi,et al.  Compatibility of motion information in two aircraft attitude displays for a tracking task. , 2010, The American journal of psychology.

[72]  R. Shepard Discrimination and generalization in identification and classification: Comment on Nosofsky. , 1986 .

[73]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons , 1952 .

[74]  Wilson P. Tanner,et al.  Theory of recognition. , 1956 .

[75]  M. Zorzi,et al.  A computational model of the Simon effect , 1995, Psychological research.

[76]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  J. O. Urmson,et al.  The William James Lectures , 1963 .

[78]  B. Mellers,et al.  Similarity and Choice. , 1994 .

[79]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[80]  R. Proctor,et al.  The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response–effect compatibility , 2011, Psychological research.

[81]  Ashby,et al.  A Stochastic Version of General Recognition Theory. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[82]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[83]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  An instance theory of attention and memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[84]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[85]  Jan De Houwer Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses. , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[86]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Human factors in simple and complex systems , 1993 .

[87]  D. Ennis A single multidimensional model for discrimination, identification and preferential choice , 1993 .

[88]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[89]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[90]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[91]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Similarity and Recognition , 1988 .

[92]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[93]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems, Second Edition , 2008 .

[94]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[95]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification , 1994 .

[96]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[97]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[98]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[99]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[100]  B. Hommel The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation , 2000 .

[101]  H. Colonius,et al.  The Fechnerian idea. , 2011, The American journal of psychology.

[102]  Vladimir A. Zorich Elements of the theory , 2011 .

[103]  M. Eimer,et al.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[104]  James D. Miles,et al.  Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[105]  Motonori Yamaguchi,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[106]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[107]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Multidimensional Fechnerian Scaling: Basics. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[108]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[109]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Logical-rule models of classification response times: a synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. , 2010, Psychological review.

[110]  R. Klein,et al.  Parametric exploration of the Simon effect across visual space. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[111]  T. Zandt,et al.  How to fit a response time distribution , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[112]  J. R. Simon The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[113]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Flanker compatibility effects in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Impact of target onset delay and trial-by-trial stimulus variation , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[114]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition , 2014 .

[115]  C H COOMBS,et al.  Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. , 1950, Psychological review.

[116]  Yili Liu,et al.  Introduction to Human Factors Engineering (2nd Edition) , 2003 .

[117]  Geert De Soete,et al.  Probabilistic multidimensional models op pairwise choice data , 1992 .

[118]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[119]  D. McDowell Foreword , 1999 .

[120]  D. Ennis Confusable and discriminable stimuli: Comment on Nosofsky (1986) and Shepard (1986). , 1988 .

[121]  R M Nosofsky,et al.  Luce’s choice model and Thurstone’s categorical judgment model compared: Kornbrot’s data revisited , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[122]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[123]  D. Ennis,et al.  A general model for preferential and triadic choice in terms of centralF distribution functions , 1994 .

[124]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Model evaluation using grouped or individual data , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[125]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[126]  R. Audley,et al.  SOME ALTERNATIVE STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHOICE1 , 1965 .

[127]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[128]  Robert M Nosofsky,et al.  Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[129]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS , 1952 .

[130]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and motor programming of manual response sequences , 1984 .

[131]  C. Moore,et al.  Looking for the source of the simon effect: evidence of multiple codes. , 2004, The American journal of psychology.

[132]  M. Zorzi,et al.  The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[133]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[134]  B. Hommel,et al.  Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions , 2007, Psychological research.

[135]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[136]  R. L. Deininger,et al.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[137]  Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al.  Elements of a Theory , 1992 .

[138]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.