Homogenizing Responses to Different Survey Questions on the Same Topic: Proposal of a Scale Homogenization Method Using a Reference Distribution

AbstractSurvey data are often used for comparison purposes, such as comparisons across nations or comparisons over time. To be effective, this would require equivalent questions and equivalent responses options to the questions. Yet there is a lot of variation in the response scales used, which, for example, differ in the number of response options used and the labeling of these options. This is the case in happiness research, and as a result most of the research data in this field is incomparable. Several methods have been proposed to transform ratings on verbal response scales to a common numerical scale, typically ranging from 0 to 10. In this paper we give an overview of the progress made in those Scale Homogenization methods over time. We describe two early methods: Linear Stretch and the Semantic Judgement of Fixed Word Value Method. Next we discuss the Semantic Judgement of Word Value in Context Method in more detail. Based on these discussions we propose a new Reference Distribution Method. We apply the Semantic Judgement of Word Value in Context and the Reference Distribution Methods to data on happiness in The Netherlands for the years 1989–2009. We show that the Reference Distribution Method produces comparable time series on different questions and that it allows discontinuities in data to be corrected.

[1]  Hock-Earn Lim,et al.  The Use of Different Happiness Rating Scales: Bias and Comparison Problem? , 2008 .

[2]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[3]  D. Katz DO INTERVIEWERS BIAS POLL RESULTS , 1942 .

[4]  Milton Lodge,et al.  Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions , 1981 .

[5]  C H Caldwell,et al.  Interviewer effects in public health surveys. , 2010, Health education research.

[6]  W. Kalmijn From Discrete 1 to 10 Towards Continuous 0 to 10: The Continuum Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Happiness in a Nation , 2011, Social indicators research.

[7]  The international scale interval study , 2009 .

[8]  R. Veenhoven,et al.  Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations 1946–1992. , 1993 .

[9]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality , 1976 .

[10]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research: Saris/Design , 2007 .

[11]  C. L. Hull The Conversion of Test Scores into Series Which Shall Have Any Assigned Mean and Degree of Dispersion. , 1922 .

[12]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being , 1976 .

[13]  E. Diener,et al.  Most People Are Happy , 1996 .

[14]  Leslie F. Clark,et al.  RATING SCALES NUMERIC VALUES MAY CHANGE THE MEANING OF SCALE LABELS , 1991 .

[15]  R. Winkelmann,et al.  Reported Happiness, Fast and Slow , 2012 .

[16]  P. Theuns,et al.  Effects of Varying Response Formats on Self-ratings of Life-Satisfaction , 2009 .

[17]  Scaling the Semantics of Satisfaction , 2000 .

[18]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[19]  Lyle V. Jones,et al.  The psychophysics of semantics: an experimental investigation. , 1955 .

[20]  R. Veenhoven World Database of Happiness. Example of a Focused ‘Findings Archive’ , 2011 .

[21]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research , 2007 .

[22]  Robert A. Cummins,et al.  Normative Life Satisfaction: Measurement Issues and a Homeostatic Model , 2003 .

[23]  E. Lavernia,et al.  An experimental investigation , 1992, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[24]  L. Arends,et al.  Happiness Scale Interval Study. Methodological Considerations , 2010, Social indicators research.