Lesion detection at seven Tesla in multiple sclerosis using magnetisation prepared 3D-FLAIR and 3D-DIR

AbstractObjectivesTo examine the feasibility and value of 7 T 3D T2-weighted Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) and Double Inversion Recovery (DIR) MR sequences for lesion detection in multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsHigh-resolution 3D-FLAIR and 3D-DIR MR sequences at 7 T were obtained using magnetisation preparation (MP), and compared with 2D-T2-weighted and 3D-T1-weighted sequences in 10 MS patients and five healthy controls. We determined contrast ratios and counted lesions according to anatomical location.ResultsMR imaging at 7 T was safe and allowed multi-contrast imaging within clinically acceptable imaging times. Lesion to white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) contrast ratios were higher in 3D-MP-FLAIR and 3D-MP-DIR compared with 2D-T2 and 3D-T1. Cortical (mixed+intra-cortical) and total lesion counts were 97/592 on 3D-MP-FLAIR and 100/558 on 3D-MP-DIR compared with 84/384 on 2D-T2 and 42/442 on 3D-T1. More juxta-cortical lesions were seen with 3D-MP-FLAIR (205) and 3D-MP-DIR (133) than with 2D-T2 (125) and 3D-T1 (70). Finally, higher numbers of lesions were found for deep WM lesions: 176 for 3D-MP-FLAIR and 196 for 3D-MP-DIR vs. 155 for 2D-T2 and 131 for 3D-T1.ConclusionsNear isotropic 3D-MP-FLAIR and 3D-MP-DIR allows high quality T2-weighted MR imaging in MS at 7 T, improving (cortical) lesion detection. Key Points • Magnetization prepared 3D-FLAIR and 3D-DIR 7 T MRI provide high quality isotropic images. • MS lesions are well demonstrated by 3D-MP-FLAIR and 3D-MP-DIR at 7 T MRI. • 3D-MP-FLAIR and 3D-MP-DIR at 7 T MRI show many more Virchov-Robin spaces.

[1]  Thomas Brinker,et al.  Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: New challenges in health and disease , 2008, Cerebrospinal Fluid Research.

[2]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Multislice T1 relaxation time measurements in the brain using IR‐EPI: Reproducibility, normal values, and histogram analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  H. Schild,et al.  Axonal Damage But No Increased Glial Cell Activity in the Normal-Appearing White Matter of Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndromes Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis Using High-Field Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  Jaco J. M. Zwanenburg,et al.  Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI at 7.0 Tesla: comparison with 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla , 2009, European Radiology.

[5]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Multi-contrast, isotropic, single-slab 3D MR imaging in multiple sclerosis , 2008, European Radiology.

[6]  Peter R Luijten,et al.  High‐resolution magnetization‐prepared 3D‐FLAIR imaging at 7.0 Tesla , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  David Pitt,et al.  Imaging cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Archives of neurology.

[8]  S. Reingold,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria” , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Pratik Mukherjee,et al.  High‐Resolution Phased‐Array MRI of the Human Brain at 7 Tesla: Initial Experience in Multiple Sclerosis Patients , 2010, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[10]  Nikos Evangelou,et al.  A Comparison of 3T and 7T in the Detection of Small Parenchymal Veins Within MS Lesions , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Dong-Hyun Kim,et al.  Triple-layer appearance of Brodmann area 4 at thin-section double inversion-recovery MR imaging. , 2009, Radiology.

[12]  M. Schlamann,et al.  First Clinical Study on Ultra-High-Field MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of 1.5T and 7T , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  W. Reddick,et al.  More than meets the eye: significant regional heterogeneity in human cortical T1. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging. , 2005, Radiology.

[15]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  Potential and feasibility of parallel MRI at high field , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  Jonas A. Castelijns,et al.  Magnetization Prepared (MP) 3D DIR at 7.0 Tesla , 2010 .

[17]  Matilde Inglese,et al.  Double Inversion Recovery MRI with Fat Suppression at 7 Tesla: Initial Experience , 2010, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[18]  M Rovaris,et al.  Cortical/subcortical disease burden and cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  M Riva,et al.  In vivo detection of cortical plaques by MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  C. Poser,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis , 2001, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[21]  F. Barkhof,et al.  High field MRI in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: high field–high yield? , 2009, Neuroradiology.

[22]  Henry F. McFarland,et al.  Examination of the role of magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: A problem-orientated approach , 2009, Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology.

[23]  Roberto Mutani,et al.  Grey Matter Pathology in Multiple Sclerosis , 2005, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[24]  Caterina Mainero,et al.  In vivo imaging of cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis using ultra-high field MRI , 2009, Neurology.

[25]  J. Reijneveld,et al.  Hypertension risk in idiopathic hyperCKemia , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[26]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Does high-field MR imaging improve cortical lesion detection in multiple sclerosis? , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[27]  Epilepsy: randomised trials and genetic tribulations , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[28]  F Träber,et al.  Double inversion recovery brain imaging at 3T: diagnostic value in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[29]  Hiroyuki Fujita,et al.  New horizons in MR technology: RF coil designs and trends. , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[30]  S. Nelson,et al.  Quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of multiple sclerosis at 7 Tesla with sensitivity to iron , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[31]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Does high field MRI allow an earlier diagnosis of multiple sclerosis? , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[32]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Improved in vivo detection of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis using double inversion recovery MR imaging at 3 Tesla , 2010, European Radiology.

[33]  N. Joan Abbott,et al.  Evidence for bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid: significance for physiology and pathology , 2004, Neurochemistry International.

[34]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Extensive heterogeneity in white matter intensity in high-resolution T2 *-weighted MRI of the human brain at 7.0 T , 2006, NeuroImage.