An Eye Tracking Study into the Effects of Graph Layout

Graphs are typically visualized as node-link diagrams. Although there is a fair amount of research focusing on crossing minimization to improve readability, little attention has been paid on how to handle crossings when they are an essential part of the final visualizations. This requires us to understand how people read graphs and how crossings affect reading performance. As an initial step to this end, a preliminary eye tracking experiment was conducted. The specific purpose of this experiment was to test the effects of crossing angles and geometric-path tendency on eye movements and performance. Sixteen subjects performed both path search and node locating tasks with six drawings. The results showed that small angles can slow down and trigger extra eye movements, causing delays for path search tasks, whereas crossings have little impact on node locating tasks. Geometric-path tendency indicates that a path between two nodes can become harder to follow when many branches of the path go toward the target node. The insights obtained are discussed with a view to further confirmation in future work.

[1]  Peter Eades,et al.  Edge crossings in drawings of bipartite graphs , 1994, Algorithmica.

[2]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Layout Effects on Sociogram Perception , 2005, GD.

[3]  Christof Körner,et al.  Sequential processing in comprehension of hierarchical graphs , 2004 .

[4]  Petra Mutzel,et al.  An Alternative Method to Crossing Minimization on Hierarchical Graphs , 1996, GD.

[5]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[6]  Petra Mutzel An Alternative Method to Crossing Minimization on Hierarchical Graphs , 2001, SIAM J. Optim..

[7]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Speed of comprehension of visualized ordered sets. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  Colin Ware,et al.  Cognitive Measurements of Graph Aesthetics , 2002, Inf. Vis..

[9]  Jim Blythe,et al.  The effect of spatial arrangement on judgments and errors in interpreting graphs , 1997 .

[10]  Weidong Huang,et al.  How People Read Graphs , 2005, APVIS.

[11]  Thomas Hill Statistics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[12]  Philippe Castagliola,et al.  A Comparison of the Readability of Graphs Using Node-Link and Matrix-Based Representations , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.

[13]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Crossing Number is NP-Complete , 1983 .

[14]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Communicating Centrality in Policy Network Drawings , 1999, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[15]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Robert F. Cohen,et al.  Validating Graph Drawing Aesthetics , 1995, GD.

[17]  Michael Kaufmann,et al.  Drawing graphs: methods and models , 2001 .

[18]  Helen C. Purchase,et al.  Which Aesthetic has the Greatest Effect on Human Understanding? , 1997, GD.

[19]  Michael Jünger,et al.  Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for 2-Layer Straightline Crossing Minimization , 1995, GD.