Decentralized Estimation and Control in High Precision Spacecraft Formations: Comparison Studies

High-precision formation flying missions can implement very large science instruments, but require a very high level of coordination and control. Two coordination and control architectures are described and evaluated on two small prototypical formation flying missions. The first architecture is based on a decentralized, parallel estimation approach with every spacecraft in the formation maintaining an estimate of the entire formation state. Each spacecraft updates its estimator on the basis of local measurements and communicated information from other spacecraft. The second architecture uses a central spacecraft to maintain the formation estimate and calculate the required control actions for all other spacecraft. Communication is required to convey the measurements and actuation commands between the central spacecraft and the rest of the formation. These case studies illustrate that in the presence of small communication delays and communication channel noise, the decentralized architecture outperforms the centralized one, even in the case where it has fewer communication links.

[1]  C. Fridlund.  Darwin – The Infrared Space Interferometry Mission , 2000 .

[2]  P.R. Lawson.  The Terrestrial Planet Finder , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[3]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Distributed coordination and control of formation flying spacecraft , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[4]  Keunmo Kang,et al.  Communication Design for Coordinated Control with a Non-Standard Information Structure , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  R.S. Smith,et al.  Distributed Estimator Design for a Formation with Markovian Communication Topology , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[6]  Antoine Labeyrie,et al.  Astronomy from Satellite Clusters , 1984 .

[7]  R. Murray,et al.  Graph rigidity and distributed formation stabilization of multi-vehicle systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[8]  Roy S. Smith,et al.  Parallel Estimators and Communication in Spacecraft Formations , 2005 .

[9]  Roy S. Smith,et al.  Closed-Loop Dynamics of Cooperative Vehicle Formations With Parallel Estimators and Communication , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Gerardo Lafferriere,et al.  Decentralized control of vehicle formations , 2005, Syst. Control. Lett..

[11]  P. Wang,et al.  Coordination and control of multiple microspacecraft moving in formation , 1996 .

[12]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Mehran Mesbahi,et al.  Formation flying control of multiple spacecraft via graphs , 2001 .

[14]  Daniel Y. Gezari,et al.  Multiple Spacecraft Michelson Stellar Interferometer , 1984, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[15]  Andrew G. Sparks,et al.  Spacecraft formation flying: dynamics and control , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[16]  D. T. Stansbery,et al.  Nonlinear Control of Satellite Formation Flight , 2000 .

[17]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  INFORMATION FLOW AND COOPERATIVE CONTROL OF VEHICLE FORMATIONS , 2002 .

[18]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Formation control strategies for a separated spacecraft interferometer , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[19]  Frank H. Bauer,et al.  SATELLITE FORMATION FLYING USING AN INNOVATIVE AUTONOMOUS CONTROL SYSTEM (AUTOCON) ENVIRONMENT , 1997 .

[20]  R. Bracewell.  Detecting nonsolar planets by spinning infrared interferometer , 1978, Nature.

[21]  G. Sholomitsky,et al.  Infra-red space interferometer , 1977 .

[22]  F.Y. Hadaegh,et al.  A survey of spacecraft formation flying guidance and control. Part II: control , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[23]  Zahidul H. Rahman,et al.  An Overview of the Formation and Attitude Control System for the Terrestrial Planet Finder Formation Flying Interferometer , 2004 .

[24]  M. Mesbahi.  On State-dependent dynamic graphs and their controllability properties , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  J. Geromel,et al.  Extended H 2 and H norm characterizations and controller parametrizations for discrete-time systems , 2002 .

[26]  R.S. Smith,et al.  A distributed parallel estimation architecture for cooperative vehicle formation control , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[27]  William M. Folkner,et al.  Enabling concepts for a dual spacecraft formation-flying optical interferometer for NASA's ST3 mission , 1999 .

[28]  Fred Y. Hadaegh,et al.  Synchronized Rotation of Multiple Autonomous Spacecraft with Rule-Based Controls: Experimental Study , 2001 .

[29]  Roy S. Smith,et al.  Control of Deep-Space Formation-Flying Spacecraft; Relative Sensing and Switched Information , 2005 .

[30]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[31]  R.S. Smith,et al.  Design of a Distributed Decentralized Estimator for a Formation with Fixed Communication Topology , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[32]  Fred Y. Hadaegh,et al.  Adaptive Control of Formation Flying Spacecraft for Interferometry , 1998 .

[33]  Roger P. Linfield,et al.  Interferometer instrument design for New Millennium Deep Space 3 , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[34]  Anthony B. Decou.  Orbital station-keeping for multiple spacecraft interferometry , 1991 .