Exports, imports, and economic growth in Portugal: evidence from causality and cointegration analysis

Abstract This paper investigates the Granger-causality between exports, imports, and economic growth in Portugal over the period 1865–1998. The role of the import variable in the investigation of exports–output causality is emphasized, enabling one to test for the cases direct causality, indirect causality, and spurious causality between export growth and output growth. The empirical results do not confirm a unidirectional causality between the variables considered. There is a feedback effect between exports–output growth and imports–output growth. More interestingly, there is no kind of significant causality between import–export growth. Both results seem to support the conclusion that the growth of output for the Portuguese economy during that period revealed a shape associated with a small dual economy in which the intra-industry transactions were very limited.

[1]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[2]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[3]  P. Phillips.  Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression , 1988 .

[4]  Peter C. B. Phillips,et al.  Vector Autoregressions and Causality , 1993 .

[5]  S. Johansen.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS , 1988 .

[6]  P. Romer,et al.  Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth , 1990 .

[7]  Howard Pack.  Endogenous Growth Theory: Intellectual Appeal and Empirical Shortcomings , 1994 .

[8]  J. Geweke,et al.  THE ESTIMATION AND APPLICATION OF LONG MEMORY TIME SERIES MODELS , 1983 .

[9]  John Thornton,et al.  Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Mexico, 1895-1992 , 1996 .

[10]  E. Helpman.  Growth, technological progress, and trade , 1988 .

[11]  Adrian C. Darnell,et al.  A Dictionary of Econometrics , 1994 .

[12]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  W. Jung,et al.  Exports, growth and causality in developing countries , 1985 .

[14]  M. Michaely.  Exports and growth: An empirical investigation , 1977 .

[15]  Edward F. Buffie.  On the Condition for Export-Led Growth , 1992 .

[16]  Glenn D. Rudebusch,et al.  On the Power of Dickey-Fuller Tests against Fractional Alternatives , 1991, Business Cycles.

[17]  J. Stock,et al.  Testing for Common Trends , 1988 .

[18]  Dalia. Marin.  IS THE EXPORT-LED GROWTH HYPOTHESIS VALID FOR INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES? , 1992 .

[19]  P. Segerstrom,et al.  A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle , 1990 .

[20]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[22]  R. Findlay.  Growth and development in trade models , 1984 .

[23]  J. Brander,et al.  Market structure and foreign trade , 1985 .

[24]  P. Phillips,et al.  Vector autoregression and causality , 1991 .

[25]  L. Oxley.  Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Portugal, 1865–1985 , 1993 .

[26]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[27]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[28]  Nigar Hashimzade,et al.  A dictionary of economics , 1997 .

[29]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[30]  Gershon Feder.  On exports and economic growth , 1983 .

[31]  Wilfred J. Ethier.  National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade , 1982 .