Morphology-Based Distinction Between Healthy and Pathological Cells Utilizing Fourier Transforms and Self-Organizing Maps

The appearance and the movements of immune cells are driven by their environment. As a reaction to a pathogen invasion, the immune cells are recruited to the site of inflammation and are activated to prevent a further spreading of the invasion. This is also reflected by changes in the behavior and the morphological appearance of the immune cells. In cancerous tissue, similar morphokinetic changes have been observed in the behavior of microglial cells: intra-tumoral microglia have less complex 3-dimensional shapes, having less-branched cellular processes, and move more rapidly than those in healthy tissue. The examination of such morphokinetic properties requires complex 3D microscopy techniques, which can be extremely challenging when executed longitudinally. Therefore, the recording of a static 3D shape of a cell is much simpler, because this does not require intravital measurements and can be performed on excised tissue as well. However, it is essential to possess analysis tools that allow the fast and precise description of the 3D shapes and allows the diagnostic classification of healthy and pathogenic tissue samples based solely on static, shape-related information. Here, we present a toolkit that analyzes the discrete Fourier components of the outline of a set of 2D projections of the 3D cell surfaces via Self-Organizing Maps. The application of artificial intelligence methods allows our framework to learn about various cell shapes as it is applied to more and more tissue samples, whilst the workflow remains simple.

[1]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  Spherical harmonic analysis of cortical complexity in autism and dyslexia , 2012, Translational neuroscience.

[2]  Shinn-Ying Ho,et al.  NeurphologyJ: An automatic neuronal morphology quantification method and its application in pharmacological discovery , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Robert F. Murphy,et al.  Joint modeling of cell and nuclear shape variation , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  A Screen for Morphological Complexity Identifies Regulators of Switch-like Transitions between Discrete Cell Shapes , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[5]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis Identification Based on Fractional Fourier Entropy and a Modified Jaya Algorithm , 2018, Entropy.

[6]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  3D Shape Analysis for Early Diagnosis of Malignant Lung Nodules , 2011, IPMI.

[7]  Winston Shim,et al.  Functional Morphometric Analysis in Cellular Behaviors: Shape and Size Matter , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[8]  Frithjof Kruggel,et al.  Robust parametrization of brain surface meshes , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Pete E. Lestrel,et al.  Fourier Descriptors and their Applications in Biology , 2008 .

[10]  Andreas Luch,et al.  Cell shape characterization and classification with discrete Fourier transforms and self‐organizing maps , 2018, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[11]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Essentials of the self-organizing map , 2013, Neural Networks.

[12]  Raluca Niesner,et al.  Time lapse in vivo microscopy reveals distinct dynamics of microglia‐tumor environment interactions—a new role for the tumor perivascular space as highway for trafficking microglia , 2016, Glia.

[13]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[14]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[15]  Anja E Hauser,et al.  Recent advances in dynamic intravital multi‐photon microscopy , 2011, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.