Shared promiscuous activities and evolutionary features in various members of the amidohydrolase superfamily.

The amidohydrolase superfamily comprises hundreds of hydrolytic enzymes of the (beta/alpha)8 barrel fold with mono- or binuclear active-site metal centers, and a diverse spectrum of substrates and reactions. Promiscuous activities, or cross-reactivities, between different members of the same superfamily may provide important hints regarding evolutionary and mechanistic relationships. We examined three members: dihydroorotase (DHO), phosphotriesterase (PTE), and PTE-homology protein (PHP). Of particular interest are PTE, which is thought to have evolved within the last several decades, and PHP, an amidohydrolase superfamily member of unknown function, and the closest known homologue of PTE. We found a diverse and partially overlapping pattern of promiscuous activities in these enzymes, including a significant lactonase activity in PTE, esterase activities in both PTE and PHP, and a weak PTE activity in DHO. Directed evolution was applied to improve the promiscuous esterase activities of PTE and PHP. Remarkably, the most recurrent mutation increasing esterase activity in PTE, or PHP, maps to the same location in their superposed 3D structures. The evolved variants also exhibit newly acquired promiscuous activities that were not selected for, including very weak, yet measurable, paraoxonase activity in PHP. Our results illustrate the mechanistic, structural, and evolutionary links between these enzymes, and highlight the importance of studying laboratory evolution intermediates that might resemble node intermediates along the evolutionary pathways leading to the divergence of enzyme superfamilies.

[1]  G. Farber,et al.  The structure and evolution of a/β barrel proteins , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[2]  C Sander,et al.  An evolutionary treasure: unification of a broad set of amidohydrolases related to urease , 1997, Proteins.

[3]  N. Oppenheimer,et al.  Structure and mechanism , 1989 .

[4]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[5]  R. Reid,et al.  Evolution in action. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[6]  C. P. Whitman,et al.  Evolution of enzymatic activity in the tautomerase superfamily: mechanistic and structural studies of the 1,3-dichloropropene catabolic enzymes. , 2004, Bioorganic chemistry.

[7]  R. Raines,et al.  Identifying latent enzyme activities: substrate ambiguity within modern bacterial sugar kinases. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[8]  F. Raushel,et al.  Structural and catalytic diversity within the amidohydrolase superfamily. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[9]  J. Oakeshott,et al.  Evolution of an organophosphate-degrading enzyme: a comparison of natural and directed evolution. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[10]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Directed evolution of phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta for heterologous expression in Escherichia coli results in stabilization of the metal-free state. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[11]  F. Raushel,et al.  High resolution X-ray structures of different metal-substituted forms of phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[12]  W. Stemmer.  DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Biochemical Characterization and Crystallographic Structure of an Escherichia coli Protein from the Phosphotriesterase Gene Family. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[14]  I. Rayment,et al.  Evolution of enzymatic activities in the orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase suprafamily: enhancing the promiscuous D-arabino-hex-3-ulose 6-phosphate synthase reaction catalyzed by 3-keto-L-gulonate 6-phosphate decarboxylase. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[15]  A D Ellington,et al.  In vitro evolution of beta-glucuronidase into a beta-galactosidase proceeds through non-specific intermediates. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Catalytic and binding poly‐reactivities shared by two unrelated proteins: The potential role of promiscuity in enzyme evolution , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Directed evolution of mammalian paraoxonases PON1 and PON3 for bacterial expression and catalytic specialization. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M Wilmanns,et al.  Directed evolution of a (beta alpha)8-barrel enzyme to catalyze related reactions in two different metabolic pathways. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  F. Raushel,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of phosphotriesterase: an enzyme capable of detoxifying organophosphate nerve agents. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[20]  Nozomi Nagano,et al.  Barrel structures in proteins: Automatic identification and classification including a sequence analysis of TIM barrels , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[21]  F. Raushel,et al.  Phosphotriesterase: an enzyme in search of its natural substrate. , 2000, Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology.

[22]  F. Raushel,et al.  Purification and properties of the phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  W. Stemmer,et al.  Directed evolution of a fucosidase from a galactosidase by DNA shuffling and screening. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  John Alan Gerlt,et al.  Evolution of function in (β/α)8-barrel enzymes , 2003 .

[25]  P. Jennings,et al.  Random mutagenesis of the substrate-binding site of a serine protease can generate enzymes with increased activities and altered primary specificities. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[26]  S. Wain-Hobson,et al.  Hypermutagenic PCR involving all four transitions and a sizeable proportion of transversions. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  K. D. Collins,et al.  Dihydroorotase from Escherichia coli. Purification and characterization. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  U. Bornscheuer,et al.  Screening, Nucleotide Sequence, and Biochemical Characterization of an Esterase from Pseudomonas fluorescens with High Activity towards Lactones , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  H. Kagamiyama,et al.  Directed evolution of an aspartate aminotransferase with new substrate specificities. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Ke Liu,et al.  A despecialization step underlying evolution of a family of serine proteases. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[31]  F. Raushel,et al.  The Binding of Substrate Analogs to Phosphotriesterase* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  A. Fersht,et al.  Mimicking natural evolution in vitro: An N-acetylneuraminate lyase mutant with an increased dihydrodipicolinate synthase activity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Catalytic promiscuity and the evolution of new enzymatic activities. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[34]  D. M. Brown,et al.  An approach to random mutagenesis of DNA using mixtures of triphosphate derivatives of nucleoside analogues. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The hydratase activity of malonate semialdehyde decarboxylase: mechanistic and evolutionary implications. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  P. Babbitt,et al.  Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  I. Rayment,et al.  Evolution of enzymatic activities in the orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase suprafamily: mechanistic evidence for a proton relay system in the active site of 3-keto-L-gulonate 6-phosphate decarboxylase. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[38]  V. E. Lewis,et al.  Structure-activity relationships in the hydrolysis of substrates by the phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[39]  F. Raushel,et al.  Mechanism of the dihydroorotase reaction. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[40]  Patricia C. Babbitt,et al.  Evolutionary Potential of (β/α)8-Barrels: Functional Promiscuity Produced by Single Substitutions in the Enolase Superfamily† , 2003 .

[41]  R. Jensen.  Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function. , 1976, Annual review of microbiology.

[42]  F. Raushel,et al.  Hydrolysis of Phosphodiesters through Transformation of the Bacterial Phosphotriesterase* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  F. Raushel,et al.  Mechanism for the hydrolysis of organophosphates by the bacterial phosphotriesterase. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[44]  A. Tocilj,et al.  Biological Crystallography Structure of an Aryl Esterase from Pseudomonas Fluorescens , 2022 .

[45]  F. Raushel,et al.  Metal-substrate interactions facilitate the catalytic activity of the bacterial phosphotriesterase. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[46]  Gregory A. Petsko,et al.  The evolution of a/ barrel enzymes , 1990 .

[47]  K. Lai,et al.  Modification of near active site residues in organophosphorus hydrolase reduces metal stoichiometry and alters substrate specificity. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[48]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Directed evolution of the promiscuous esterase activity of carbonic anhydrase II. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[49]  F. Raushel,et al.  Characterization of the zinc binding site of bacterial phosphotriesterase. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[50]  A. Fersht.  Structure and mechanism in protein science , 1998 .