A practical approach for estimating the floor deformability in existing RC buildings: evaluation of the effects in the structural response and seismic fragility

A study is presented on the evaluation of the floor deformability in the existing RC buildings and the related effects on the structural behaviour and the seismic fragility are investigated. In particular, the study of the seismic behaviour of existing RC buildings is strictly related to the initial assumptions made by practitioners on the numerical model, which usually assume the floor as rigid, according to a criterion of reducing time and computational efforts. Nevertheless, this hypothesis can provide unrealistic responses, with effect of obtaining not conservative results in the vulnerability estimation. In a view of practitioners’ necessities, a new numerical practical procedure is developed, in order to provide an a priori definition about the effective floor deformability of three-dimensional finite element models. This procedure has been tested on a couple of real existing RC school buildings, modelled with several numerical configurations and accounting for the presence of all elements that constitute the entire buildings (floor system, infill panels and elements of retrofit). Based on the evaluation of structural response and seismic fragility, some interesting observations have been provided, with the aim to define and to prevent the possible errors by assuming the floor as rigid.

[1]  Nader Panahshahi,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH INELASTIC FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS , 1991 .

[2]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Criteri di progettazione antisismica degli edifici , 2004 .

[3]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[4]  Giuseppe Maddaloni,et al.  Assessment of the in-plane deformability of RC floors with traditional and innovative lightening elements in RC framed and wall structures , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[5]  Sudhir K. Jain.  Seismic Response of Buildings with Flexible Floors , 1984 .

[6]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  INFLUENCE OF NONLINEAR MODELING ON CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMED STRUCTURES , 2019 .

[7]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Applied Incremental Dynamic Analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Shen-Haw Ju,et al.  Comparison of Building Analyses Assuming Rigid or Flexible Floors , 2000 .

[9]  Giuseppina Uva,et al.  On the role of equivalent strut models in the seismic assessment of infilled RC buildings , 2012 .

[10]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi‐linear static pushovers through IDA , 2006 .

[11]  Mary Beth D. Hueste,et al.  Diaphragm Effects in Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2004 .

[12]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[13]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PEER Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology, Revisited , 2013 .

[15]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  Quantifying the seismic response of structures with flexible diaphragms , 2012 .

[16]  Arturo Tena-Colunga,et al.  Assessment of the diaphragm condition for floor systems used in urban buildings , 2015 .

[17]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  SPO2FRAG: software for seismic fragility assessment based on static pushover , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[18]  Giuseppina Uva,et al.  Effects in Conventional Nonlinear Static Analysis: Evaluation of Control Node Position , 2018 .

[19]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Seismic Fragility Functions via Nonlinear Response History Analysis , 2018, Journal of Structural Engineering.

[20]  Sergio Porco Francesco Raffaele Domenico Uva Giuseppe Ruggieri.  Rigid floor assumption in nonlinear static analysis of reinforced concrete existing buildings. , 2017 .

[21]  Jaime De-la-Colina.  In-plane floor flexibility effects on torsionally unbalanced systems , 1999 .

[22]  Panagiotis G. Asteris,et al.  Mathematical Macromodeling of Infilled Frames: State of the Art , 2011 .

[23]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Problems in Predicting Seismic Responses of RC Buildings , 1988 .

[24]  Giuseppina Uva,et al.  The influence of infilled panels in retrofitting interventions of existing reinforced concrete buildings: a case study , 2015 .

[25]  Ho Jung Lee,et al.  Interstory drift estimates for low-rise flexible diaphragm structures , 2007 .

[26]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Alternative non‐linear demand estimation methods for probability‐based seismic assessments , 2009 .

[27]  Hassan S. Saffarini,et al.  In-Plane Floor Deformations in RC Structures , 1992 .

[28]  F. Porco,et al.  A numerical procedure for modeling the floor deformability in seismic analysis of existing RC buildings , 2018, Journal of Building Engineering.

[29]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Analytical models for low-rise buildings with flexible floor diaphragms , 1985 .

[30]  Rj Mainstone,et al.  SUMMARY OF PAPER 7360. ON THE STIFFNESS AND STRENGTHS OF INFILLED FRAMES. , 1971 .

[31]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[32]  A. S. Moghadam,et al.  Seismic Response of Plan-Asymmetric Structures with Diaphragm Flexibility , 2018 .

[33]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection , 2011 .

[34]  Nader Panahshahi,et al.  Effect of openings on in-plane structural behavior of reinforced concrete floor slabs , 2016 .

[35]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Seismic response of building structures with flexible inelastic diaphragm , 1994 .

[36]  Robert B. Fleischman,et al.  Seismic Performance of Perimeter Lateral-System Structures with Highly Flexible Diaphragms , 2002 .

[37]  Jagmohan L. Humar,et al.  Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Frames , 1981 .

[38]  F. Crisafulli.  Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills , 1997 .

[39]  Bryan Stafford Smith,et al.  Behavior of Square Infilled Frames , 1966 .

[40]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES INFILLED WITH WEAKLY REINFORCED MASONRY PANELS , 2001 .