Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bone-subtraction techniques have been shown to enhance CT angiography (CTA) interpretation, but motion can lead to incomplete bone removal. The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 novel registration techniques to compensate for patient motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients underwent bone-subtraction CTA (BSCTA) for the evaluation of the neck vessels with 64-section CT. We tested 3 different registration procedures: pure rigid registration (BSCTA), slab-based registration (SB-BSCTA), and a partially rigid registration (PR-BSCTA) approach. Subtraction quality for the assessment of different vascular segments was evaluated by 2 examiners in a blinded fashion. The Cohen kappa test was applied for interobserver variability, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test, for differences between the procedures. Motion between the corresponding datasets was measured and plotted against image-quality scores. RESULTS: Algorithms with motion compensation revealed higher image-quality scores (SB-BSCTA, mean 4.31; PR-BSCTA, mean 4.43) than pure rigid registration (BSCTA, mean 3.88). PR-BSCTA was rated superior to SB-BSCTA for the evaluation of the cervical internal and external carotid arteries (P < .001), whereas there was no significant difference for the other vessels (P = .157–.655). Both algorithms were clearly superior to pure rigid registration for all vessels except the basilar and ophthalmic artery. Interobserver agreement was high (κ = 0.46–0.98). CONCLUSION: Bone-subtraction algorithms with motion compensation provided higher image-quality scores than pure rigid registration methods, especially in cases with complex motion. PR-BSCTA was rated superior to SB-BSCTA in the visualization of the internal and external carotid arteries.

[1]  J. Udupa,et al.  Three-dimensional Bone-free Rendering of the Cerebral Circulation by Use of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Fuzzy Connectedness , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[2]  H. Venema,et al.  CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  James Sayre,et al.  Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  H. Venema,et al.  Multisection CT venography of the dural sinuses and cerebral veins by using matched mask bone elimination. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  T. Leiner,et al.  Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis , 2005, European Radiology.

[7]  H. Venema,et al.  Removal of bone in CT angiography of the cervical arteries by piecewise matched mask bone elimination. , 2004, Medical physics.

[8]  J. Kanne,et al.  Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism , 2004, Circulation.

[9]  G. Rinkel,et al.  Yield of short-term follow-up CT/MR angiography for small aneurysms detected at screening. , 2006, Stroke.

[10]  K Arita,et al.  Subtracted 3D CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Enhanced 3D-Visualization of Intracranial Aneurysms Involving the Skull Base , 2003, MICCAI.

[13]  H. Bischof,et al.  Partially Rigid Bone Registration in CT Angiography , 2006 .

[14]  E Klotz,et al.  Bone-subtraction Ct Angiography for the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms Materials and Methods , 2004 .

[15]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[16]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. , 2005, European heart journal.

[17]  B. Schmidt,et al.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography , 1999, European Radiology.

[18]  K. Heimberger,et al.  Spiral CT Angiography with Digital Subtraction of Extra‐ and Intracranial Vessels , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  H. Coxson,et al.  Diagnosis of Subsegmental Pulmonary Emboli: A Multi-Center Study Using a Porcine Model , 2005, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[20]  C. Kouskouras,et al.  Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation using CTA and MRA. Correlation with DSA and intraoperative findings , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[21]  A. Fox,et al.  Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  W. Bautz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of bone-subtraction CT angiography (BSCTA) in head and neck imaging , 2006, European Radiology.

[23]  A. McMahon,et al.  Subtraction helical CT angiography of intra- and extracranial vessels: technical considerations and preliminary experience. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  Jonathan Lessick,et al.  16-MDCT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in acute chest pain syndrome: a blinded prospective study. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.