Bridging articulation and perception: The C/D model and contrastive emphasis

This paper compares prominence that listeners perceive with actual articulatory prominence. We calculated phrasal boundaries from articulatory patterns using an algorithm of the C/D model, and compared those calculated boundaries with perceived boundaries. The jaw displacements, measures of prominence, were measured using EMA; articulatory boundaries were derived from a C/D model algorithm. The data is a set of English sentences that vary in the placement of contrastive emphasis. Perception data were obtained from listeners who were asked to evaluate syllable prominence and syllable boundaries for these sentences. The results indicate that perception of syllable prominence shows strong correlations with articulatory prominence, showing that jaw displacement can be a strong perceptual cue for syllable prominence. Further, perception of syllable prominence is also correlated with algorithmicallycalculated articulatory syllable boundaries. These results encourage us to explore the relation between articulation and perception of language prosody in terms of the C/D model framework.

[1]  D. Erickson,et al.  Jaw Displacement and Metrical Structure in Japanese: The Effect of Pitch Accent, Foot Structure, and Phrasal Stress , 2014 .

[2]  Donna Erickson,et al.  Metrical Structure and Production of English Rhythm , 2012, Phonetica.

[3]  O. Fujimura,et al.  An articulatory characterization of contrastive emphasis in correcting answers , 1989 .

[4]  Donna Erickson,et al.  A study of invariant properties and variation patterns in the converter/distributor model for emotional speech , 2014, INTERSPEECH.

[5]  K. D. de Jong The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C. Menezes Changes in Phrasing in Semi-spontaneous Emotional Speech : Articulatory Evidences , 2017 .

[7]  Donna Erickson,et al.  Changes in syllable magnitude and timing due to repeated correction , 2003, Speech Commun..

[8]  Donna Erickson,et al.  Articulation of Extreme Formant Patterns for Emphasized Vowels , 2002, Phonetica.

[10]  M. Beckman,et al.  Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English , 2001 .

[11]  D. Erickson Effects of Contrastive Emphasis on Jaw Opening , 1998, Phonetica.

[12]  Osamu Fujimura,et al.  The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior , 2000, Phonetica.

[13]  M. Macchi Segmental and suprasegmental features and lip and jaw articulators , 1985 .

[14]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Perceived prosody: Phonetic bases of prominence and boundaries. , 2008 .

[15]  W. V. Summers Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: articulatory and acoustic analyses. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Sarah Hawkins Temporal integration in the perception of speech , 2007 .

[17]  Gabor Pinter,et al.  Boundary and Prominence Perception by Japanese Learners of English : A Preliminary Study , 2014 .