Large Courts, Small Justice! On the inefficiency and optimal structure of the Italian Justice sector

An important problem in the public sector, given the lack of output prices and exit decisions to sanction inefficient units, is finding the optimal industry structure. We apply a novel approach to Italian courts of justice, a typical example of a small sector in the public domain but with important effects on economic agents׳ behavior, firm size, FDI, and on the overall economy. The suggested approach enables us to break down the aggregate court inefficiency into different sources and to investigate the optimal structure of the justice sector. Results show that technical inefficiency (lack of best practice) accounts for more than one third (38%) of total inefficiency, while size inefficiency (courts that are too big) is about 22–25%. The remaining inefficiency is represented by a sub-optimal allocation of inputs (30–40%). If reallocation is confined to macroregional or regional borders, then technical and size inefficiencies increase in relative terms compared to reallocation inefficiency. We suggest that, together with reallocating inputs by merging smaller courts, a complementary set of policy interventions would be to adopt best practices and split larger courts.

[1]  Gani Aldashev,et al.  Legal Institutions, Political Economy, and Development , 2009 .

[2]  Matthieu Chemin The Impact of the Judiciary on Entrepreneurship: Evaluation of Pakistan's Access to Justice Programme , 2007 .

[3]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[4]  Sérgio Pereira dos Santos,et al.  On the need for reform of the Portuguese judicial system – Does Data Envelopment Analysis assessment support it? , 2014 .

[5]  Tullio Jappelli,et al.  Courts and Banks: Effects of Judicial Enforcement on Credit Markets , 2002 .

[6]  Riccardo Marselli,et al.  L’efficienza tecnica dei distretti di Corte d'Appello italiani: aspetti metodologici, benchmarking e arretrato smaltibile , 2004 .

[7]  Valentin Zelenyuk,et al.  Aggregation of Nerlovian profit indicator , 2008 .

[8]  Lei Fang,et al.  A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[10]  Luciana L. Yeung,et al.  Measuring efficiency of Brazilian courts with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2011 .

[11]  Valentin Zelenyuk,et al.  Measuring potential gains from reallocation of resources , 2007 .

[12]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[13]  Greta Falavigna,et al.  Judicial productivity, delay and efficiency: A Directional Distance Function (DDF) approach , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Antonio Peyrache,et al.  Cost constrained industry inefficiency , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Roberto Galbiati,et al.  The Deterrent Effects of Prison: Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  J. Ferrandino The Impact of Revision 7 on the Technical Efficiency of Florida's Circuit Courts , 2012 .

[17]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Input Price Variation Across Locations and a Generalized Measure of Cost Efficiency , 2008 .

[18]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  An overall measure of technical inefficiency at the firm and at the industry level: The 'lost profit on outlay' , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  An assessment of the efficiency of Spanish Courts using DEA , 1996 .

[20]  Sung-Ko Li,et al.  Measuring the productive efficiency of a group of firms , 1995 .

[21]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Human resource rightsizing using centralized data envelopment analysis: Evidence from Taiwan's Airports , 2013 .

[22]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model , 2008 .

[23]  Mette Asmild,et al.  DEA based models for reallocations of police personnel , 2012, OR Spectr..

[24]  T. J. Cook,et al.  Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts , 1982 .

[25]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Judicial Career Incentives and Court Performance: An Empirical Study of the German Labour Courts of Appeal , 2005 .

[26]  C. Guccio,et al.  Searching for the source of technical inefficiency in Italian judicial districts: an empirical investigation , 2014 .

[27]  Antonio Peyrache,et al.  Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: A comprehensive approach , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Centralized resource allocation for enhanced Russell models , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[29]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[30]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Efficiency analysis of Norwegian district courts , 1992 .

[31]  Fatih Deyneli,et al.  Analysis of relationship between efficiency of justice services and salaries of judges with two-stage DEA method , 2012 .

[32]  D. Marchesi Litiganti, avvocati e magistrati : diritto ed economia del processo civile , 2003 .

[33]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  FISCAL STRESS AND THE PRODUCTION OF PUBLIC SAFETY - A DISTANCE FUNCTION-APPROACH , 1995 .

[34]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[35]  Miguel St. Aubyn Law and Order Efficiency Measurement - A Literature Review , 2008 .