18F-FDG PET/CT Prediction of Treatment Outcomes in Human Papillomavirus–Positive, Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Receiving Deintensified Therapy: Results from NRG-HN002

Visual Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of a 12- to 14-wk posttreatment PET/CT for 2-y progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LRC) in patients with p16-positive locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (LA-OPC). Study was a secondary endpoint in NRG-HN002, a noncomparative phase II trial in p16-positive LA-OPC, stage T1-T2, N1-N2b or T3, N0-N2b, and ≤10 pack-year smoking. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to reduced-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without cisplatin. Methods: PET/CT scans were reviewed centrally. Tumor response evaluations for the primary site, right neck, and left neck were performed using a 5-point ordinal scale (Hopkins criteria). Overall scores were then assigned as negative, positive, or indeterminate. Patients with a negative score for all 3 evaluation sites were given an overall score of negative. The hypotheses were NPV for PFS and LRC at 2-y posttreatment ≤ 90% versus >90% (1-sided P value, 0.10). Results: A total of 316 patients were enrolled, of whom 306 were randomized and eligible. Of these, 131 (42.8%) patients consented to a posttherapy PET/CT, and 117 (89.3%) patients were eligible for PET/CT analysis. The median time from the end of treatment to PET/CT scan was 94 d (range, 52–139 d). Estimated 2-y PFS and LRC rates in the analysis subgroup were 91.3% (95% CI, 84.6, 95.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 87.6, 97.5%), respectively. Posttreatment scans were negative for residual tumor for 115 patients (98.3%) and positive for 2 patients (1.7%). NPV for 2-y PFS was 92.0% (90% lower confidence bound [LCB] 87.7%; P = 0.30) and for LRC was 94.5% (90% LCB 90.6%; P = 0.07). Conclusion: In the context of deintensification with reduced-dose radiation, the NPV of a 12- to 14-wk posttherapy PET/CT for 2-y LRC is estimated to be >90%, similar to that reported for patients receiving standard chemoradiation. However, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the NPV is >90% for PFS.

[1]  Yingming Sun,et al.  Therapeutic strategies of different HPV status in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2021, International journal of biological sciences.

[2]  Christopher U. Jones,et al.  Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma (NRG Oncology HN002) , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2021 , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  T. Van den Wyngaert,et al.  Quality Assessment in FDG-PET/CT Imaging of Head-and-Neck Cancer: One Home Run Is Better Than Two Doubles , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[5]  P. Ha,et al.  De-intensification strategies in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma—a narrative review , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[6]  A. Scarsbrook,et al.  Post-treatment FDG PET-CT in head and neck carcinoma: comparative analysis of 4 qualitative interpretative criteria in a large patient cohort , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[7]  A. Maes,et al.  Quantification of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake to detect residual nodal disease in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy: results from the ECLYPS study , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  Kevin P. Banks,et al.  RESISTing the Need to Quantify: Putting Qualitative FDG-PET/CT Tumor Response Assessment Criteria into Daily Practice , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  D. Schuster,et al.  Head and neck PET/CT therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins criteria) - external validation study. , 2017, American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

[10]  O. Hoekstra,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Cancer: The ECLYPS Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  C. McConkey,et al.  PET-CT Surveillance versus Neck Dissection in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Carole Fakhry,et al.  Epidemiology of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  R. Wahl,et al.  Head and Neck PET/CT: Therapy Response Interpretation Criteria (Hopkins Criteria)—Interreader Reliability, Accuracy, and Survival Outcomes , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  V. Grégoire,et al.  Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99-02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  K. Ang,et al.  Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.