The effect of R&D novelty and openness decision on firms' catch-up performance: Empirical evidence from China

Abstract This paper explores the strategic dimensions of R&D decisions toward novelty and openness in explaining the performance of latecomer firms in a developing economy. A structural equation model of R&D decision-making is formulated using survey data from 279 Chinese firms. The dimension of R&D novelty is defined as the degree of technological newness found in firms' R&D projects, while R&D openness describes the degree to which technologies are acquired from external sources. Our results indicate that firms' R&D decisions regarding novelty and openness are associated with demand opportunities, market competition, technological capability, and external networks. Greater R&D novelty contributes positively to innovative output but does not affect sales growth. Greater R&D openness contributes positively to sales growth but negatively to innovative output.

[1]  Holly J. Raider.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1998 .

[2]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit , 2011 .

[3]  Michael Hobday,et al.  East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics , 1995 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[5]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[6]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[7]  P. Trott,et al.  WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES , 2009, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[8]  Luc Soete,et al.  Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity , 1988 .

[9]  Jens Leker,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Process Innovation in the Chemical Industry , 2013 .

[10]  Denis Fred Simon,et al.  China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory , 2011 .

[11]  I. Gill,et al.  An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth , 2007 .

[12]  Guo Bin,et al.  Technology acquisition channels and industry performance : An industry-level analysis of Chinese large-and medium-size manufacturing enterprises , 2008 .

[13]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Knowledge, innovative activities and industrial evolution , 2000 .

[14]  Will Mitchell,et al.  The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market , 1998 .

[15]  Keun Lee,et al.  Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catch-up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China , 2005 .

[16]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[17]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[18]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[19]  D. Chudnovsky,et al.  Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms’ behavior (1992–2001)☆ , 2006 .

[20]  M. Feldman,et al.  Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .

[21]  F. Malerba.  Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges , 2007 .

[22]  M. Knudsen,et al.  Some immediate – but negative – effects of openness on product development performance , 2011 .

[23]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[24]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing , 2010 .

[25]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms , 2004 .

[26]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2005 .

[27]  Jaehoon Rhee,et al.  Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation , 2010 .

[28]  P. Fan.  Catching up through developing innovation capability: evidence from China's telecom-equipment industry , 2006 .

[29]  J. Galende,et al.  Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour , 2003 .

[30]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[31]  Albert N. Link,et al.  The changing composition of R & D , 1985 .

[32]  Lutao Ning,et al.  China's Rise in the World ICT Industry: Industrial Strategies and the Catch-Up Development Model , 2009 .

[33]  G. M. Duijsters,et al.  Understanding novelty creation in exploration networks, structural and relational embeddedness jointly considered , 2008 .

[34]  Jianmin Tang,et al.  Competition and innovation behaviour , 2006 .

[35]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries , 2007 .

[36]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance , 2004 .

[37]  Luca Berchicci,et al.  Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance , 2013 .

[38]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[39]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[40]  Manuel Sánchez-Pérez,et al.  Exploitation- and exploration-based innovations: The role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors , 2011 .

[41]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems , 2007 .

[42]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Does technological learning pay off? Inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement , 2002 .

[43]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technological Change , 1997 .

[44]  John Bessant,et al.  Assessing the Technological Capabilities of Firms: Developing a Policy Tool , 2007 .

[45]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: A model , 1980 .

[46]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[47]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[48]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[49]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  F. Malerba.  Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical Change , 1992 .

[51]  Aykut Lenger,et al.  To innovate or to transfer? , 2006 .

[52]  D. Kale,et al.  Exploitative and Explorative Learning as a Response to the TRIPS Agreement in Indian Pharmaceutical Firms , 2008 .

[53]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Alice H. Amsden,et al.  A new approach to assessing the technological complexity of different categories of R&D (with examples from Singapore) , 2003 .

[55]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Technological Dynamism in Asia , 2002 .

[56]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation , 2000 .

[57]  Keun Lee,et al.  Innovation, technological regimes and organizational selection in industry evolution: a ‘history friendly model’ of the DRAM industry , 2003 .

[58]  Hyun-Dae Cho,et al.  The developmental path of networking capability of catch‐up players in Korea's semiconductor industry , 2003 .

[59]  Keun Lee,et al.  Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[60]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[61]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[62]  M. Timmer.  Technological development and rates of return to investment in a catching-up economy: the case of South Korea , 2003 .

[63]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies , 2002 .

[64]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[65]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  New Directions in R&D: Current and Prospective Challenges , 2008 .

[66]  Carine Peeters,et al.  Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms , 2006 .

[67]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[68]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Firm Bebavior , 1993 .

[69]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[70]  E. Mansfield.  The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: external vs. internal technology , 1988 .

[71]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[72]  John Bessant,et al.  Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership , 2004 .

[73]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[74]  Kyoo-Ho Park,et al.  Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US patent data , 2006 .

[75]  Keun Lee,et al.  Technological Regimes, Catching-Up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries , 2001 .

[76]  Paola Garrone,et al.  Liberalisation, industry turmoil and the balance of R&D activities , 2001, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[77]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan , 2008 .

[78]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Organizational Context as a Moderator of Theories on Firm Boundaries for Technology Sourcing , 2001 .

[79]  S. Winter,et al.  The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited , 1982 .

[80]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[81]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation , 1995 .

[82]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[83]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? , 2012 .

[84]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing , 1980 .

[85]  L. Kim.  Building technological capability for industrialization: analytical frameworks and Korea's experience , 1999 .

[86]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Catch-up strategies and the latecomer effect in industrial development , 2006 .

[87]  Yoshitaka Osawa,et al.  Proposal of Industrial Research and Development Performance Indices , 2005 .

[88]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[89]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[90]  Jens Frøslev Christensen.  Asset profiles for technological innovation , 1995 .

[91]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  An audit of technological innovation capabilities in chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China , 2004 .

[92]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[93]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[94]  Tony S. Frost.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[95]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[96]  Richard Luecke,et al.  Managing creativity and innovation , 2003 .

[97]  A. Tylecote,et al.  Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? The impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies , 2013 .

[98]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[99]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .