Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions Between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] T. Houtgast,et al. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Tammo Houtgast,et al. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Torsten Dau,et al. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] R L Freyman,et al. Broadened forward-masked tuning curves from intense masking tones: delay-time and probe-level manipulations. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Torsten Dau,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Brian C J Moore,et al. Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[9] M F Dorman,et al. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Michael F Dorman,et al. Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[11] Larry E Humes,et al. Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[12] Andrew J. Oxenham,et al. Speech Perception in Tones and Noise via Cochlear Implants Reveals Influence of Spectral Resolution on Temporal Processing , 2014, Trends in hearing.
[13] Norman C. Beaulieu,et al. Accurate simple closed-form approximations to Rayleigh sum distributions and densities , 2005, IEEE Communications Letters.
[14] Brian C J Moore,et al. The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] K. D. Kryter. Methods for the Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index , 1962 .
[19] B. Moore,et al. Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Richard L Freyman,et al. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] B. Moore,et al. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] K. D. Kryter,et al. Auditory Fatigue from Audio Analgesia , 1962 .
[23] F. Zeng. Trends in Cochlear Implants , 2004, Trends in amplification.