A comparison of synchronous and virtual legislative session groups faced with an idea generation task

Abstract An experiment was conducted with groups of about eight people in face-to-face and geographically-distributed electronic meeting environments. While similar studies have focused on the behavior of group members working together in a single room or working individually in different rooms (a nominal group), this research looks at a hybrid environment in which part of a group is working in one room and another part is working simultaneously in a different room that is linked via a local area network, both parts forming a virtual group. Experimental results showed that such groups generated significantly more unique, quality comments than did face-to-face groups, and that participants were significantly more satisfied with that type of meeting. These and other results indicate that groups may be able to meet effectively when distributed geographically.

[1]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[2]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Electronic brainstorming in small and large groups , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[3]  A. Delbecq,et al.  Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1971 .

[4]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[5]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Communication technologies and collaboration systems: Common domains, problems and solutions , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[7]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[8]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group, Sub-Group, and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media? , 1994 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[12]  J. Hackman,et al.  Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions , 1970 .

[13]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[14]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Group support systems in practice: experience at IBM , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[15]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  The MIRROR project: a virtual meeting place , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[17]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .