An improved feature image matching algorithm based on Locality-Sensitive Hashing

Image matching is a classic technique in computer vision. However, the traditional local invariant features image matching algorithm has two problems, narrow scale range and long time consuming. Aiming at these problems, we proposed a fast image matching algorithm with the aid of improved local invariant features based on Locality-Sensitive Hashing. Firstly, by building simple Gaussian pyramid and achieving FAST keypoint detection, keypoints are extracted from the reference image and the candidate matching image. Then Fast Retina Keypoint feature descriptor is calculated and weighted. Furthermore, the high-dimensional data is mapped to a low dimensional space and hash indexes are built through the local sensitive hashing algorithm in aiming of finding the approximate nearest neighbor. The experimental results in different datasets indicate that the improved algorithm achieves real-time processing in image matching, and has better robustness and shorter processing time than most classical methods.

[1]  Darius Burschka,et al.  Adaptive and Generic Corner Detection Based on the Accelerated Segment Test , 2010, ECCV.

[2]  Yiannis S. Boutalis,et al.  FCTH: Fuzzy Color and Texture Histogram - A Low Level Feature for Accurate Image Retrieval , 2008, 2008 Ninth International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services.

[3]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  50 Years of object recognition: Directions forward , 2013, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  Qingming Huang,et al.  Partial-Duplicate Image Retrieval via Saliency-Guided Visual Matching , 2013, IEEE MultiMedia.

[5]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features , 2006, ECCV.

[6]  Jay A. Farrell,et al.  Real-Time Computer Vision/DGPS-Aided Inertial Navigation System for Lane-Level Vehicle Navigation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  FREAK: Fast Retina Keypoint , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Tom Drummond,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection , 2006, ECCV.

[10]  Adrien Bartoli,et al.  KAZE Features , 2012, ECCV.

[11]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[12]  Gary R. Bradski,et al.  ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[13]  Juergen Gall,et al.  Class-specific Hough forests for object detection , 2009, CVPR.

[14]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  曾峦 Zeng Luan,et al.  Star matching based on invariant feature descriptor , 2012 .

[16]  Wang Jing,et al.  Image registration method based on SURF and FREAK , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC).

[17]  Qingquan Li,et al.  A comparative analysis of image fusion methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Unsupervised Feature Learning for RGB-D Based Object Recognition , 2012, ISER.

[19]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features , 2010, ECCV.

[20]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .