A model of student approaches to learning encompassing ways to influence and change approaches

The tems surface and deep are widely used to describe student approaches to studying and learning. Different writers have attributed different shades of meaning to the terms, as the categories have resulted from the work of a number of groups or individual researchers. There are greater divergences of opinion on the question of how students can be influenced to adopt either a surface or a deep approach. This paper attempts to synthesise some of the divergent positions into a simple model of student approaches to learning which concentrates on the ways that students may be influenced to adopt either surface or deep approaches. The model recognises the existence of predispositions to either deep or surface approaches, and the use of strategies for particular tasks. A number of contextual variables seem to influence students with a deep predisposition to adopt surface strategies. The transition between surface and deep predispositions is seen as difficult to influence, but three types of intervention are discussed.

[1]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Identifying distinctive approaches to studying , 1979 .

[2]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Interactive Teaching to Promote Independent Learning from Text. , 1986 .

[3]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[4]  Euan S. Henderson,et al.  Independent learning in higher education , 1984 .

[5]  R. Glaser.  Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. , 1984 .

[6]  J. Biggs.  Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes , 1979 .

[7]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities , 1983 .

[8]  A Fransson,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning: IV -- effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[9]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[10]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[11]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[12]  H. B. Pepinsky.  Effective Study. 4th Edition. , 1971 .

[13]  B. Skinner,et al.  Science and human behavior , 1953 .

[14]  David Kember,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF FACTOR ANALYSES FROM THE APPROACHES TO STUDYING INVENTORY , 1989 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[16]  John Biggs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES IN STUDY PROCESSES , 1978 .

[17]  David Watkins,et al.  Identifying the Study Process Dimensions of Australian University Students , 1982 .

[18]  B. Joyce,et al.  Models of Teaching , 2024 .

[19]  J. Baird.  Quality: What Should Make Higher Education ‘Higher'? , 1988 .

[20]  M. Wittrock.  Learning as a Generative Process , 1974 .

[21]  R. Mayer.  Different problem-solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models. , 1975 .

[22]  John Biggs,et al.  Educology: The theory of educational practice☆ , 1976 .

[23]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[24]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[25]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[26]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective , 1987 .

[27]  R. Goldman.  Effects of a Logical Versus a Mnemonic Learning Strategy on Performance in Two Undergraduate Psychology Classes. , 1972 .

[28]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Different Rule Systems for Counting Behavior Acquired in Meaningful and Rote Contexts of Learning. , 1977 .

[29]  J. B. Biggs.  Study Behaviour and Performance in Objective and Essay Formats , 1973 .

[30]  Lewis Elton,et al.  Trends in research on student learning , 1979 .

[31]  E. V. Rossum,et al.  The Relationship between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome. , 1984 .

[32]  J. Bain,et al.  Consistency in learning strategies , 1982 .

[33]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Recent Approaches to the Study and Teaching of ‘Effective Learning’ in Higher Education , 1981 .

[34]  John P. Bean.  Conceptual models of student attrition: How theory can help the institutional researcher , 1982 .

[35]  K. A. Percy,et al.  Student and staff perceptions and “the pursuit of excellence” in british higher education , 1976 .

[36]  F. Marton,et al.  The Experience of Learning , 1984 .

[37]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Integration of information during problem solving due to a meaningful context of learning , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[38]  G. Pask.  STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[39]  Tony Buzan,et al.  Use Your Head , 1974 .

[40]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[41]  P. Ramsden,et al.  Learning skills, or skill in learning? , 1987 .

[42]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  Teaching students to learn : a student-centred approach , 1981 .

[43]  B. Skinner.  Review Lecture - The technology of teaching , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[44]  D. Ausubel,et al.  Role of discriminability in meaningful paralleled learning. , 1963 .

[45]  D. Ausubel.  The psychology of meaningful verbal learning : an introduction to school learning / David P. Ausubel , 1963 .

[46]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[47]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[48]  John Biggs,et al.  The Role of Metacognition in Enhancing Learning , 1988 .