Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers

Purpose:Effective parental education about newborn blood-spot screening may facilitate prompt follow-up, reduce psychosocial harms, and promote trust in screening programs. However, little is known about the aspects of education delivery and content that are of most importance for fostering understanding and meeting parental expectations. We aimed to identify elements of newborn blood-spot screening education and their associations with mothers’ knowledge and satisfaction levels.Methods:We conducted a survey (by mail) of 1,712 mothers who were residing in Ontario, Canada, and whose infants had recently undergone newborn blood-spot screening.Results:We received 750 completed questionnaires (response rate 47%). Factors associated with respondents’ higher knowledge of newborn blood-spot screening were higher level of education (odds ratio = 2.79), English being spoken at home (odds ratio = 1.96), receiving an information sheet at the time of newborn blood-spot screening (odds ratio = 1.57), and receiving information about how to interpret the results (odds ratio = 2.65). Factors associated with being satisfied were: receiving information prenatally (odds ratio = 2.35), from a health-care professional (odds ratio = 4.54), or from an information sheet at the time of newborn blood-spot screening (odds ratio = 1.72); and receiving messages about the purpose of screening (odds ratio = 3.78), the communication process (odds ratio = 2.57), the interpretation of the results (odds ratio = 4.19), and sample-handling methods (odds ratio = 3.13).Conclusion:Promoting mothers’ understanding and meeting their expectations with respect to education about newborn blood-spot screening may require greater engagement with prenatal providers. It also calls for a greater emphasis on communicating with mothers about how blood samples are handled and about the meaning of the test results.Genet Med 2012:14(12):963–970

[1]  Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system. , 2006, Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics.

[2]  Illinois.,et al.  Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: a blueprint for the future - a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs , 2000, Pediatrics.

[3]  S. Detmar,et al.  Information and informed consent for neonatal screening: opinions and preferences of parents. , 2007, Birth.

[4]  Roger L. Brown,et al.  Newborn Screening: An Appeal for Improved Parent Education , 2009, The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing.

[5]  Michael S. Watson,et al.  Newborn Screening: Toward a Uniform Screening Panel and System—Executive Summary , 2006, Pediatrics.

[6]  S. Oliver,et al.  Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[7]  S. Ratzan,et al.  Addressing the vaccine confidence gap , 2011, The Lancet.

[8]  Jeffrey Botkin,et al.  State Laws Regarding the Retention and Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Samples , 2011, Pediatrics.

[9]  Committee Opinion No. 481: Newborn screening. , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  A. Kemper,et al.  Completeness and Complexity of Information Available to Parents From Newborn-Screening Programs , 2005, Pediatrics.

[11]  S. Waisbren,et al.  Expanded Newborn Screening for Biochemical Disorders: The Effect of a False-Positive Result , 2006, Pediatrics.

[12]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[13]  Y. Bombard,et al.  Citizens’ Values Regarding Research With Stored Samples From Newborn Screening in Canada , 2012, Pediatrics.

[14]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Newborn screening information supports public health more than informed choice , 2005 .

[15]  L. Ross,et al.  Incorporating newborn screening into prenatal care. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  S. Nicholls,et al.  Parental information use in the context of newborn bloodspot screening. An exploratory mixed methods study , 2012, Journal of Community Genetics.

[17]  J. Botkin,et al.  Public Attitudes Regarding the Use of Residual Newborn Screening Specimens for Research , 2012, Pediatrics.

[18]  B. Potter,et al.  Newborn screening education on the internet: a content analysis of North American newborn screening program websites , 2011, Journal of Community Genetics.

[19]  H. Dawkins,et al.  New mothers' awareness of newborn screening, and their attitudes to the retention and use of screening samples for research purposes , 2005, Genomics, society, and policy.

[20]  A. Kemper,et al.  Informing parents about newborn screening. , 2005, Public health nursing.

[21]  N. Manson,et al.  Why do patients want information if not to take part in decision making? , 2010, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[22]  E. Clayton.  Talking with parents before newborn screening. , 2005, The Journal of pediatrics.

[23]  Penny Kyler,et al.  Recommendations for Effective Newborn Screening Communication: Results of Focus Groups With Parents, Providers, and Experts , 2006, Pediatrics.

[24]  S. Waisbren,et al.  A review of the psychosocial effects of false-positive results on parents and current communication practices in newborn screening , 2006, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[25]  J. Little,et al.  Informing Parents About Expanded Newborn Screening: Influences on Provider Involvement , 2009, Pediatrics.

[26]  Stephanie M. Fullerton,et al.  Research Practice and Participant Preferences: The Growing Gulf , 2011, Science.

[27]  Jennifer Couzin-Frankel,et al.  Science Gold Mine, Ethical Minefield , 2009, Science.

[28]  Brooks C. Holtom,et al.  Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research , 2008 .

[29]  J. Quinlivan,et al.  Factors affecting mothers’ knowledge of genetic screening , 2004, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.