Arguing that the development of a notion of sense-making is of critical importance to improving science learning, this paper examines science teaching in four Boston (Massachusetts)-area classrooms that participated in an experiment on ways of integrating technology thto a sixth-grade science curriculum on the earth's seasons. The task of the teachers was to deoign a unit that ricluded modeling and data collection components and to integrate the use of technology into these activities. As the work progressed, the project took the form of a formative experiment in which teachers modified their approaches and the researchers modified their support as they attempted to achieve a goal of engaging students in active science learning activities. Detailed descriptions of activities in the four classrooms point to the ways that a common curriculum design, which takes the scientific theory as the objective, can result in the dissociation of the data from the theory, and suggest some of t;le difficulties in bringing together the conditions for helping students make sense of science. It is noted that, in many cases, data are discussed without engaging in questions about why the data have a particular pattern; structural equation models are often taught directly with no explicit discussion of how the model explains specific data; and the systematic dissociation of theory and practice can also apply to the use of simulations, databases, and telecommunications. A discussion of the'simulation SunLab examines the use of this computer-assisted instructional program both as a surrogate for the earth-sun system model, and as a data collection device. It is concluded that classroom or group discussion may prove more fruitful than individual exploration, and that the teachers' role is crucial in creating the framework. It is further argued that the design of database and microcomputer learning systems should allow for the sharing of data and models from the start. (29 references) (DB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF SOUCAT1ON Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMAMN CENTER (ERIC) O This document has been reproduced as received horn the person or organuLation originating It o Minor changes have bean made to improve reproduction Qualify Points of view or opinions stated in this docu ment do not necessal.ly represent official OERI position ar poky BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION 610 WEST 112th STREET NEW YORK, NY 10025 DM NOV 11111111 "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
[1]
P. D. Hurd.
New directions in teaching secondary school science
,
1969
.
[2]
Magdalene Lampert.
Knowing, Doing, and Teaching Multiplication. Occasional Paper No. 97.
,
1986
.
[3]
Paul F. Brandwein,et al.
Teaching elementary science through investigation and colloquium
,
1971
.
[4]
Marlene Scardamalia,et al.
Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments
,
1989
.
[5]
M. Rowe,et al.
Teaching science as continuous inquiry
,
1973
.
[6]
Magdalene Lampert,et al.
When the Problem Is Not the Question and the Solution Is Not the Answer: Mathematical Knowing and Teaching
,
1990
.
[7]
L. S. Vygotksy.
Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes
,
1978
.
[8]
A. Collins,et al.
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
,
1989
.
[9]
J. Stigler,et al.
Mathematics learning in Japanese, Chinese, and American classrooms.
,
1988,
New directions for child development.