Biased attention and the fused dichotic words test

This study examines the effect of biased attention on the fused dichotic words test (FDWT) and the CV syllables dichotic listening test (CVT). Eight males and eight females were given both tests with two different instructions: to direct attention to the left ear (DL), or to the right ear (DR). These instructions led to highly significant differences in response on the CVT, but only a marginal shift in performance on the FDWT. While the FDWT is not completely unaffected by attentional manipulations, it is far less influenced by such effects than the CVT. This indicates that subject-initiated shifts of attention are much less likely to affect performance on the FDWT than on other dichotic tests and makes it a more valuable task to assess cerebral speech lateralization.

[1]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Attentional Effects in Dichotic Listening , 1995, Brain and Language.

[2]  B. Repp,et al.  Parameters of spectral/temporal fusion in speech perception , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Perceptual asymmetry on the dichotic fused words test and cerebral speech lateralization determined by the carotid sodium amytal test , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  G. Underwood.  Strategies of information processing , 1980 .

[6]  William H. Gaddes,et al.  Performance on a free-recall verbal dichotic listening task and cerebral dominance determined by the carotid amytal test , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Dichotic listening tests in studying brain-behavior relationships , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Terry Halwes,et al.  Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Recognition of fused dichotic words: An examination of the effects of head-turn and perceived spatial position , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. Bryden,et al.  Controlling for stimulus dominance in dichotic listening tests: A modification of !l. , 1994 .

[11]  Brenda Milner,et al.  Clinical and Surgical Studies of the Cerebral Speech Areas in Man , 1975 .

[12]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research. , 1988 .

[13]  K. Munhall,et al.  Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening , 1983, Brain and Language.

[14]  M. Corballis,et al.  The influence of gender, handedness and head-turn on auditory asymmetries , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  The “Forced-Attention Paradigm” in Dichotic Listening to CV-Syllables: A Comparison Between Adults and Children , 1986, Cortex.

[16]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  The effects of head and eye turns on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening , 1990, Brain and Language.

[17]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  The influence of attention on the dichotic REA , 1991, Neuropsychologia.