RACORO continental boundary layer cloud investigations: 2. Large‐eddy simulations of cumulus clouds and evaluation with in situ and ground‐based observations

A 60-hour case study of continental boundary layer cumulus clouds is examined using two large-eddy simulation (LES) models. The case is based on observations obtained during the RACORO Campaign (Routine Atmospheric Radiation Measurement [ARM] Aerial Facility [AAF] Clouds with Low Optical Water Depths [CLOWD] Optical Radiative Observations) at the ARM Climate Research Facility's Southern Great Plains site. The LES models are driven by continuous large-scale and surface forcings, and are constrained by multi-modal and temporally varying aerosol number size distribution profiles derived from aircraft observations. We compare simulated cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties with ground-based remote sensing and aircraft observations. The LES simulations capture the observed transitions of the evolving cumulus-topped boundary layers during the three daytime periods, and generally reproduce variations of droplet number concentration with liquid water content (LWC), corresponding to the gradient between the cloud centers and cloud edges at given heights. The observed LWC values fall within the range of simulated values; the observed droplet number concentrations are commonly higher than simulated, but differences remain on par with potential estimation errors in the aircraft measurements. Sensitivity studies examine the influences of bin microphysics versus bulk microphysics, aerosol advection, supersaturation treatment, and aerosol hygroscopicity. Simulated macrophysical cloud properties are found to be insensitive in this non-precipitating case, but microphysical properties are especially sensitive to bulk microphysics supersaturation treatment and aerosol hygroscopicity.

[1]  A. W. Green,et al.  An Approximation for the Shapes of Large Raindrops , 1975 .

[2]  N. Mansour,et al.  On the Application of the Dynamic Smagorinsky Model to Large-Eddy Simulations of the Cloud-Topped Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2006 .

[3]  Steven K. Krueger,et al.  SUMMARY OF PROGRESS AND MAIN ACTIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE NINTH MEETING OF THE GEWEX CLOUD SYSTEM STUDY ( GCSS , 2001 .

[4]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  RACORO continental boundary layer cloud investigations: 3. Separation of parameterization biases single‐column model CAM5 simulations of shallow cumulus , 2015 .

[5]  M. H. Zhang,et al.  Objective Analysis of ARM IOP Data: Method and Sensitivity , 1999 .

[6]  Michael J. Foster,et al.  A comparison of multiscale variations of decade‐long cloud fractions from six different platforms over the Southern Great Plains in the United States , 2014 .

[7]  J. Böhm.  Revision and clarification of “A general hydrodynamic theory for mixed-phase microphysics” , 1999 .

[8]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  CGILS: Results from the first phase of an international project to understand the physical mechanisms of low cloud feedbacks in single column models , 2013 .

[9]  Raymond A. Shaw,et al.  Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Mixing in Cumulus Clouds: Dependence on Local Turbulence Structure , 2009 .

[10]  David A. Randall,et al.  High-Resolution Simulation of Shallow-to-Deep Convection Transition over Land , 2006 .

[11]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 1. Single aerosol type , 1998 .

[12]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[13]  Shengjie Niu,et al.  Exploring parameterization for turbulent entrainment‐mixing processes in clouds , 2013 .

[14]  Jian Wang,et al.  RACORO continental boundary layer cloud investigations: 1. Case study development and ensemble large‐scale forcings , 2015 .

[15]  H. Gerber,et al.  Ground-Based FSSP and PVM Measurements of Liquid Water Content , 1999 .

[16]  Gerald M. Stokes,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program , 2003 .

[17]  M. Petters,et al.  A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity , 2006 .

[18]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Marine low cloud sensitivity to an idealized climate change: The CGILS LES intercomparison , 2013 .

[19]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: Programmatic Background and Design of the Cloud and Radiation Test Bed , 1994 .

[20]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  CLOUDS AND CLIMATE: A PROBLEM THAT REFUSES TO DIE. Clouds of many , 2022 .

[21]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer , 2009 .

[22]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Controls on precipitation and cloudiness in simulations of trade‐wind cumulus as observed during RICO , 2011 .

[23]  Bruce E. Anderson,et al.  Ice nucleation processes in upper tropospheric wave‐clouds observed during SUCCESS , 1998 .

[24]  J. Böhm.  A general hydrodynamic theory for mixed-phase microphysics. Part II: collision kernels for coalescence , 1992 .

[25]  B. Albrecht,et al.  Large eddy simulations of continental shallow cumulus convection , 2003 .

[26]  Jimmy W. Voyles,et al.  The Arm Climate Research Facility: A Review of Structure and Capabilities , 2013 .

[27]  Virendra P. Ghate,et al.  Multiple-scale simulations of stratocumulus clouds , 2010 .

[28]  R. Stull,et al.  The LCL Zone and Cumulus Onset , 1985 .

[29]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Retrieving Liquid Wat0er Path and Precipitable Water Vapor From the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Microwave Radiometers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Justin W. Monroe,et al.  RACORO Extended-Term Aircraft Observations of Boundary Layer Clouds , 2012 .

[31]  H. Gerber,et al.  New microphysics sensor for aircraft use , 1994 .

[32]  Roland B. Stull,et al.  A Fair-Weather Cumulus Cloud Classification Scheme for Mixed-Layer Studies , 1985 .

[33]  J. Deardorff.  Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model , 1980 .

[34]  C. McKay,et al.  Rapid calculation of radiative heating rates and photodissociation rates in inhomogeneous multiple scattering atmospheres , 1989 .

[35]  Mikhail Ovchinnikov,et al.  Droplet nucleation: Physically‐based parameterizations and comparative evaluation , 2011 .

[36]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types , 2000 .

[37]  J. Böhm.  A general hydrodynamic theory for mixed-phase microphysics. Part I: drag and fall speed of hydrometeors , 1992 .

[38]  Xiaoqing Wu,et al.  A Comparison of TWP-ICE Observational Data with Cloud-Resolving Model Results , 2012 .

[39]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Effects of Domain Size and Numerical Resolution on the Simulation of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2002 .

[40]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot , 2000, Science.

[41]  P. Hobbs,et al.  A Model for Particle Microphysics,Turbulent Mixing, and Radiative Transfer in the Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer and Comparisons with Measurements , 1995 .

[42]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Objective Determination of Cloud Heights and Radar Reflectivities Using a Combination of Active Remote Sensors at the ARM CART Sites , 2000 .

[43]  Chunsong Lu,et al.  Examination of turbulent entrainment‐mixing mechanisms using a combined approach , 2011 .

[44]  H. Böhm.  A General Equation for the Terminal Fall Speed of Solid Hydrometeors. , 1989 .

[45]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Evaluation of Large-Eddy Simulations via Observations of Nocturnal Marine Stratocumulus , 2005 .

[46]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[47]  C. Bretherton,et al.  A GCSS Boundary-Layer Cloud Model Intercomparison Study Of The First Astex Lagrangian Experiment , 1999 .

[48]  J. Curry,et al.  A New Double-Moment Microphysics Parameterization for Application in Cloud and Climate Models. Part I: Description , 2005 .

[49]  J. Huba,et al.  Simulation of the seeding of equatorial spread F by circular gravity waves , 2013 .

[50]  Chunsong Lu,et al.  Empirical relationship between entrainment rate and microphysics in cumulus clouds , 2013 .

[51]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A Large Eddy Simulation Intercomparison Study of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2003 .

[52]  Jean-Christophe Golaz,et al.  Large‐eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land , 2002 .

[53]  A. Pier Siebesma,et al.  Entrainment and detrainment in cumulus convection: an overview , 2013 .

[54]  J. Curry,et al.  Confronting Models with Data: The Gewex Cloud Systems Study , 2003 .

[55]  H. Morrison,et al.  Modeling Supersaturation and Subgrid-Scale Mixing with Two-Moment Bulk Warm Microphysics , 2008 .

[56]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Developing long‐term single‐column model/cloud system–resolving model forcing data using numerical weather prediction products constrained by surface and top of the atmosphere observations , 2004 .

[57]  James G. Hudson,et al.  Entrainment, Mixing, and Microphysics in Trade-Wind Cumulus , 2008 .

[58]  K.,et al.  Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli under a Strong Inversion , 2001 .