PID controller frequency-domain tuning for stable, integrating and unstable processes, including dead-time

Abstract In the present paper a new tuning procedure is proposed for the ideal PID controller in series with the first-order noise filter. It is based on the recently proposed extension of the Ziegler–Nichols frequency-domain dynamics characterization of a process Gp(s). Measured process characteristics are the ultimate frequency and ultimate gain, the angle of the tangent to the Nyquist curve of the process at the ultimate frequency, and Gp(0). For a large class of processes the same tuning formulae can be effectively applied to obtain closed-loop responses with predictable properties. Load disturbance step responses without the undershoot and reference step responses with negligible overshoot are obtained by analyzing a test batch consisting of stable, integrating and unstable processes, including dead-time and oscillatory dynamics. The proposed tuning makes possible to specify the desired sensitivity to the high frequency measurement noise and the desired maximum sensitivity. Comparison with the optimal ideal PID controller in series with the first-order noise filter is presented and discussed. The extension of the proposed method to the PI controller tuning is direct. Comparison with the optimal PI controller is presented and discussed.

[1]  Moonyong Lee,et al.  IMC−PID Controller Design for Improved Disturbance Rejection of Time-Delayed Processes , 2007 .

[2]  Rolf Isermann Digital Control Systems , 1981 .

[3]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  Design of PID controllers based on constrained optimization , 1999 .

[4]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  Evaluation and simple tuning of PID controllers with high-frequency robustness , 2006 .

[5]  J. G. Ziegler,et al.  Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers , 1942, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[6]  K. Åström,et al.  Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols step response method for PID control , 2004 .

[7]  C. Hang,et al.  Refinements of the Ziegler-Nichols tuning formula , 1991 .

[8]  Alf Isaksson,et al.  Derivative filter is an integral part of PID design , 2002 .

[9]  Aidan O'Dwyer,et al.  Handbook of PI and PID controller tuning rules , 2003 .

[10]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  New Tuning Methods for PID Controllers , 1995 .

[11]  Tomislav B. Sekara,et al.  Optimization of PID Controller Based on Maximization of the Proportional Gain Under Constraints on Robustness and Sensitivity to Measurement Noise , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Relay Feedback Auto-tuning of Process Controllers – A Tutorial Review , 2002 .

[13]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning , 2003 .

[14]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  The future of PID control , 2000 .

[15]  F G Shinskey,et al.  How Good are Our Controllers in Absolute Performance and Robustness? , 1990 .

[16]  Miroslav R. Mataušek,et al.  Revisiting the Ziegler–Nichols process dynamics characterization , 2010 .

[17]  M. A. Johnson,et al.  Process identifier and its application to industrial control , 2000 .

[18]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  Robust and optimal tuning of PI and PID controllers , 2002 .

[19]  K.J. ÅSTRÖM,et al.  Design of PI Controllers based on Non-Convex Optimization , 1998, Autom..

[20]  J. W. Park,et al.  Phase-locked loops for plant tuning and monitoring , 2003 .