The location of the Myers-Briggs type indicator in personality factor space

Abstract Two factor analyses were performed to investigate the validity of the Italian version of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Form F by locating the MBTI scales and factors in personality factor space in order to establish their meaning. In the first analysis the four continuous scores of the MBTI were subjected to a factor analysis together with the scales of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) Form C and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) with a sample of 227 subjects. Five factors were obtained of which three resembled three of the five factors of the five-factor model of personality (Extraversion, Tough-mindedness and Anxiety). They appear to be closely related to the EPQ E, P and N factors. In the second analysis, the MBTI factor scores were subjected to a factor analysis together with the scales of the 16PF and the EPQ. The results were similar to those of the first analysis. The authors conclude that one only MBTI scale seems to have a clear meaning (EI). Of the three remaining scales, SN and JP seem to overlap at some extension, while TF seems to be not sufficiently pure, because it loads on two different factors. It is suggested the MBTI has to be substantially modified.

[1]  H. Eysenck Dimensions of personality : 16, 5 or 3? ― Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm , 1991 .

[2]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[3]  Ralph A. Alexander,et al.  Item Analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[4]  J. B. Murray Review of Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1990 .

[5]  R. Cattell,et al.  Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF) , 1970 .

[6]  M. Carlyn,et al.  An assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. , 1977, Journal of personality assessment.

[7]  G. Sipps,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a Measure of Sociability and Impulsivity , 1988 .

[8]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Four ways five factors are not basic , 1992 .

[10]  Paul Kline,et al.  An easy guide to factor analysis , 1993 .

[11]  R. Alexander,et al.  The Multifactorial Nature of Extraversion-Introversion in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Eysenck Personality Inventory , 1987 .

[12]  O C Tzeng,et al.  Item validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[13]  P. Kline,et al.  Item factor analysis of the seventy-one experimental items of the Italian version of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1996 .

[14]  H. Eysenck,et al.  The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. , 1977, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[15]  B. Thompson,et al.  Construct Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1986 .

[16]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire , 1975 .

[17]  J. G. Carlson Recent assessments of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[18]  Aristide Saggino,et al.  Item factor analysis of the Italian version of the Myers-Briggs type indicator , 1995 .

[19]  P. Costa,et al.  Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. , 1989, Journal of personality.