Inhibitory Processes for Critical Situations – The Role of n−2 Task Repetition Costs in Human Multitasking Situations

The human cognitive system is equipped with various processes for dealing with everyday challenges. One of such processes is the inhibition of currently irrelevant goals or mental task-sets, which can be seen as a response to the critical event of information overflow in the cognitive system and challenging the cognitive system’s ability to keep track of ongoing demands. In two experiments, we investigate the flexibility of the inhibitory process by inserting rare non-critical events (25% of all trials), operationalized as univalent stimuli (i.e., unambiguous stimuli that call for only one specific task in a multitasking context), and by introducing the possibility to prepare for an upcoming task (Experiment 2). We found that the inhibitory process is not influenced by a cue informing subjects about the upcoming occurrence of a univalent stimulus. However, the introduction of univalent stimuli allowed preparatory processes to modify the impact of the inhibitory process. Therefore, our results suggest that inhibitory processes are engaged in a rather global manner, not taking into account variations in stimulus valence, which we took as operationalization of critical, conflict-inducing events in the ongoing stream of information processing. However, rare uncritical events, such as univalent stimuli that do not cause conflict and interference in the processing stream, appear to alter the way the cognitive system can take advantage of preparatory processes.

[1]  Iring Koch,et al.  Inhibition of response mode in task switching. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[2]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Chunking in Task Sequences Modulates Task Inhibition , 2006, Psychological science.

[3]  J. Grange,et al.  Task preparation and task inhibition: a comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010) , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  T. Woodward,et al.  Bivalency is costly: bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding. , 2003, Experimental psychology.

[5]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  Dorit Wenke,et al.  The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  J. Grange,et al.  The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The dual implication of dual affordance: stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[9]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  I. Koch,et al.  The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[12]  A. Allport,et al.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[13]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[14]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  On the difficulty of task switching: Assessing the role of task-set inhibition , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  I. Koch,et al.  Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Short Article: Inhibition of irrelevant category–response mappings , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Task conflict effect in task switching , 2010, Psychological research.

[18]  I. Koch,et al.  Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  S. Monsell Control of mental processes , 2021, Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind.

[20]  I. Koch,et al.  The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Grange,et al.  Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets , 2007 .

[23]  G. D. Logan Task Switching , 2022 .

[24]  T. Goschke Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching , 2000 .

[25]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  F. Ferlazzo,et al.  Stimulus-related inhibition of task set during task switching. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[27]  K. Arbuthnott,et al.  Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[28]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching , 2006 .

[29]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  The role of inhibition in task switching: A review , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.