Fracture system identification of coal reservoir and the productivity differences of CBM wells with different coal structures: A case in the Yanchuannan Block, Ordos Basin

Abstract Fracture system identification of coal reservoirs plays a vital role in evaluating favorable zone of coalbed methane (CBM) development and improving CBM well productivity. In order to identify the fracture system of the No. 2 coal reservoir, and to determine the productivity differences of CBM wells with different coal structures in the Yanchuannan (YCN) Block, Ordos Basin, China, a comprehensive analysis method from macroscopy to microscopy and from static to dynamic was provided in this work. Site observations on coal sections and observations under light microscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were combined to understand the fracture characteristics of the coal seam, and the spatial geological model of fracture development was built. The selected logging data was conducted cluster analysis to identify the coal structures of coring wells and to predict the coal structures of non-coring wells. The analysis results show that the No. 2 coal seam has a high fracture development degree, and is dominated by type II coal structure (cataclastic coals). The coals with different structures show evident zonation on the plane, which is largely controlled by faults. The well-developed fracture system and high permeability zone mainly concentrate on the tectonic rolling areas and the areas with small faults. Furthermore, the output data of coal fine and the drainage curves of CBM wells were performed dynamic analysis to indirectly reflect the fracture system difference and the resulting productivity difference. The results indicate that the wells with poor-preserved coals tend to produce more coal fine, and the gas production has a negative correlation with coal fine amount. The productivity pattern of CBM wells can be divided into “high yield—long-term stable yield” and “low yield—decline quickly”. Almost all CBM wells with type I coal structure and most CBM wells with type II coal structure have the first productivity pattern, and part wells with type II coal structure and all wells with type III coal structure present the second productivity pattern.

[1]  G. D. Toro,et al.  Strain-insensitive preferred orientation of porphyroclasts in Mont Mary mylonites , 2001 .

[2]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells: Review of theory and best practices , 2013 .

[3]  Chen Yu The distribution of coal structure in Hancheng based on well logging data , 2013 .

[4]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Evaluation of the reservoir permeability of anthracite coals by geophysical logging data , 2011 .

[5]  J. Pashin,et al.  Structural control of coalbed methane production in Alabama , 1998 .

[6]  Z. Pan,et al.  Mineral occurrence and its impact on fracture generation in selected Qinshui Basin coals: An experimental perspective , 2015 .

[7]  M. Fields,et al.  Investigation of coal-associated bacterial and archaeal populations from a diffusive microbial sampler (DMS) , 2013 .

[8]  S. Longo,et al.  Unsteady Flow of Shear-Thinning Fluids in Porous Media with Pressure-Dependent Properties , 2015, Transport in Porous Media.

[9]  Zhang Yu-gui,et al.  Quantitative identification of deformed coals by geophysical logging , 2011 .

[10]  C. Karacan,et al.  Fracture/cleat analysis of coals from Zonguldak Basin (northwestern Turkey) relative to the potential of coalbed methane production , 2000 .

[11]  Ling Li,et al.  Characterization of coal fines generation: A micro-scale investigation , 2015 .

[12]  Jinxing Song,et al.  Experimental study of water blocking damage on coal , 2017 .

[13]  A. Reynolds,et al.  A Well Test for In-Situ Determination of Relative Permeability Curves , 2008 .

[14]  Tang You-yi Improvement and perfect way for the classification of the shape and cause formation of coal body texture , 2004 .

[15]  Dameng Liu,et al.  Microscopic characteristics of microfractures in coals: an investigation into permeability of coal , 2009 .

[16]  Victor Rudolph,et al.  Evaluation of coal structure and permeability with the aid of geophysical logging technology , 2009 .

[17]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams , 2005 .

[18]  D. Johnson,et al.  Coal microstructure and micropermeability and their effects on natural gas recovery , 1992 .

[19]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Coal reservoir characteristics and coalbed methane resource assessment in Huainan and Huaibei coalfields, Southern North China , 2009 .

[20]  M. Zuber,et al.  Production characteristics and reservoir analysis of coalbed methane reservoirs , 1998 .

[21]  Xie Xuehen Quantitative Identification of Deformed Coals Based on Logging Response , 2013 .

[22]  Wei Li,et al.  Deformation and reservoir properties of tectonically deformed coals , 2014 .

[23]  Zhang Xiao-ming In-situ stress and coal reservoir pressure in Southeast margin of Ordos basin and their coupling relations , 2013 .