Displacement back analysis for underground engineering based on immunized continuous ant colony optimization

The objective function of displacement back analysis for rock parameters in underground engineering is a very complicated nonlinear multiple hump function. The global optimization method can solve this problem very well. However, many numerical simulations must be performed during the optimization process, which is very time consuming. Therefore, it is important to improve the computational efficiency of optimization back analysis. To improve optimization back analysis, a new global optimization, immunized continuous ant colony optimization, is proposed. This is an improved continuous ant colony optimization using the basic principles of an artificial immune system and evolutionary algorithm. Based on this new global optimization, a new displacement optimization back analysis for rock parameters is proposed. The computational performance of the new back analysis is verified through a numerical example and a real engineering example. The results show that this new method can be used to obtain suitable parameters of rock mass with higher accuracy and less effort than previous methods. Moreover, the new back analysis is very robust.

[1]  Wei Gao,et al.  Fast immunized evolutionary programming , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753).

[2]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  A unified ant colony optimization algorithm for continuous optimization , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Yuzhen Yu,et al.  An intelligent displacement back-analysis method for earth-rockfill dams , 2007 .

[4]  K. Grossauer,et al.  Back-Analysis of Tunnel Response Using Simulated Annealing , 2009 .

[5]  Genki Yagawa,et al.  An extensible evolutionary algorithm approach for inverse problems , 1998 .

[6]  Marte Gutierrez,et al.  Parameter identification in numerical modeling of tunneling using the Differential Evolution Genetic Algorithm (DEGA) , 2012 .

[7]  Hongbo Zhao,et al.  Back Analysis of Geomechanical Parameters in Underground Engineering Using Artificial Bee Colony , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[8]  Yvon Riou,et al.  Single‐and multi‐objective genetic algorithm optimization for identifying soil parameters , 2012 .

[9]  Daniel Dias,et al.  Back analysis of geomechanical parameters by optimisation of a 3D model of an underground structure , 2011 .

[10]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant colony optimization for continuous domains , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Pierpaolo Oreste,et al.  Back-Analysis Techniques for the Improvement of the Understanding of Rock in Underground Constructions , 2005 .

[12]  Manuel López-Ibáñez,et al.  Ant colony optimization , 2010, GECCO '10.

[13]  Gao Wei Back analysis of rock mass parameters based on evolutionary algorithm , 2000 .

[14]  D. L. Millar Automated Back Analysis of Ground Response In Rocks And Soils Via Evolutionary Computing , 1996 .

[15]  José Sena-Cruz,et al.  Back analysis of geomechanical parameters in underground works using an Evolution Strategy algorithm , 2013 .

[16]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[17]  Marc Boulon,et al.  Soil parameter identification using a genetic algorithm , 2008 .

[18]  Peng Li,et al.  Back - Analysis of Mechanics Parameters of Tunnel Based on Particle Swarm Optimization and Numerical Simulation , 2011 .

[19]  John C. Brigham,et al.  Inverse calculation of in situ stress in rock mass using the Surrogate-Model Accelerated Random Search algorithm , 2014 .

[20]  Shunde Yin,et al.  Geomechanical parameters identification by particle swarm optimization and support vector machine , 2009 .

[21]  Akbar A. Javadi,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF PARAMETERS FOR AIR PERMEABILITY OF SHOTCRETE TUNNEL LINING USING A GENETIC ALGORITHM , 1999 .

[22]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Back analysis of measured displacements of tunnels , 1983 .

[23]  Isam Shahrour,et al.  The Feedback Analysis of Excavated Rock Slope , 2001 .