Nonlinear Amygdala Response to Face Trustworthiness: Contributions of High and Low Spatial Frequency Information

Previous neuroimaging research has shown amygdala sensitivity to the perceived trustworthiness of neutral faces, with greater responses to untrustworthy compared with trustworthy faces. This observation is consistent with the common view that the amygdala encodes fear and is preferentially responsive to negative stimuli. However, some studies have shown greater amygdala activation to positive compared with neutral stimuli. The first goal of this study was to more fully characterize the amygdala response to face trustworthiness by modeling its activation with both linear and nonlinear predictors. Using fMRI, we report a nonmonotonic response profile, such that the amygdala responds strongest to highly trustworthy and highly untrustworthy faces. This finding complicates future attempts to make inferences about mental states based on activation in the amygdala. The second goal of the study was to test for modulatory effects of image spatial frequency filtering on the amygdala response. We predicted greater amygdala sensitivity to face trustworthiness for low spatial frequency images compared with high spatial frequency images. Instead, we found that both frequency ranges provided sufficient information for the amygdala to differentiate faces on trustworthiness. This finding is consistent with behavioral results and suggests that trustworthiness information may reach the amygdala through pathways carrying both coarse and fine resolution visual signals.

[1]  Jeffrey S. Maxwell,et al.  Human Amygdala Responsivity to Masked Fearful Eye Whites , 2004, Science.

[2]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Andrew L. Alexander,et al.  Contextual Modulation of Amygdala Responsivity to Surprised Faces , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Leah H. Somerville,et al.  Dissociable Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions to Social Memory , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Amygdala activity related to enhanced memory for pleasant and aversive stimuli , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Todorov.  Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  K. Zilles,et al.  ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[10]  C. Izard.  The face of emotion , 1971 .

[11]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. Rauch,et al.  A functional MRI study of human amygdala responses to facial expressions of fear versus anger. , 2001, Emotion.

[13]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[14]  T. Ito,et al.  REFLECTIONS ON SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE , 2010 .

[15]  P. Ekman,et al.  Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings , 1972 .

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI Experiments , 1998, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Dolan,et al.  A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating "unseen" fear. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  The amygdala and FFA track both social and non-social face dimensions , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Moonja P. Kim,et al.  Comparison of two structural models of implicit personality theory. , 1980 .

[20]  Takashi Tsukiura,et al.  Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: implications for the Beauty-is-Good stereotype. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[21]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences What Does the Amygdala Contribute to Social Cognition? , 2022 .

[22]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Implicit Trustworthiness Decisions: Automatic Coding of Face Properties in the Human Amygdala , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Daniel Tranel,et al.  The human amygdala is necessary for developing and expressing normal interpersonal trust , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  A. Anderson,et al.  Emotional memory: What does the amygdala do? , 1997, Current Biology.

[25]  R. Adolphs.  Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala , 1997 .

[26]  D. Perrett,et al.  A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions , 1996, Nature.

[27]  M. Bar.  A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Ríos,et al.  The striatum beyond reward: caudate responds intensely to unpleasant pictures , 2009, Neuroscience.

[29]  Janine Willis,et al.  First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.

[30]  Daniel M Wegner,et al.  The neural substrates of action identification. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[31]  I. Craw,et al.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Harald T Schupp,et al.  Affective blindsight: intact fear conditioning to a visual cue in a cortically blind patient. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Effects of Low-Spatial Frequency Components of Fearful Faces on Fusiform Cortex Activity , 2003, Current Biology.

[34]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  R. Näsänen.  Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[36]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Amygdala and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex responses to appearance-based and behavior-based person impressions. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[38]  J. Eberhardt,et al.  Imaging race. , 2005, The American psychologist.

[39]  P. S. Vivekananthan,et al.  A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[41]  R. Elliott,et al.  Differential Response Patterns in the Striatum and Orbitofrontal Cortex to Financial Reward in Humans: A Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  E. J. Williams.  The Comparison of Regression Variables , 1959 .

[44]  J. Grafman,et al.  The Human Amygdala: An Evolved System for Relevance Detection , 2003, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[45]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Remembering beauty: Roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces , 2011, NeuroImage.

[46]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Aspects of neuroticism and the amygdala: Chronic tuning from motivational styles , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- Tin Chen, Bargh / Consequences of Automatic Evaluation Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 2022 .

[48]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Bar,et al.  Very first impressions. , 2006, Emotion.

[50]  M. Walton,et al.  Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Neural activation in the “reward circuit” shows a nonlinear response to facial attractiveness , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[52]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Integration of gaze direction and facial expression in patients with unilateral amygdala damage. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[53]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[55]  S. Rauch,et al.  Response and Habituation of the Human Amygdala during Visual Processing of Facial Expression , 1996, Neuron.

[56]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The human amygdala in social judgment , 1998, Nature.

[57]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[58]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Distributed Neural Representation of Expected Value , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.