Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device.

PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy and the usability of an electromagnetic tracking device in maxillo-facial surgery through testing on a phantom skull under operating room (OR) conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS A standard plastic skull phantom was equipped with a custom made model of the maxilla and with target markers and dental brackets. Imaging was performed with a computed tomography (CT) scanner. The extent and robustness of the electromagnetic tracking system's target registration error (TRE) was evaluated under various conditions. RESULTS For each measurement a total of 243 registrations were performed with 5 point registration and 4374 registrations with 6 point registration. The average target registration error for the 5 point registration under OR conditions was 2.1 mm (SD 0.86) and 1.03 (SD 0.53) for the 6 point registration. Metallic instruments applied to the skull increased the TRE significantly in both registration methods. CONCLUSION The electromagnetic tracking device showed a high accuracy and performed stable in both registration methods. Electromagnetic interference due to metallic instruments was significant but the extent of TRE was still acceptable in comparison to optical navigation devices. A benefit of EM tracking is the absence of line-of-sight hindrance. The test setting simulating OR conditions has proven suitable for further studies.

[1]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A Schramm,et al.  Indications for computer-assisted treatment of cranio-maxillofacial tumors. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[3]  Joachim Mühling,et al.  Template-based registration for image-guided maxillofacial surgery. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  Joachim Mühling,et al.  The accuracy of image guided surgery based on cone beam computer tomography image data. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  F Vorbeck,et al.  Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography Imaging for Updating a Three‐Dimensional Navigation System , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  M. Donat,et al.  Stability of miniature electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment protocols for elektromagnetic tracking systems , 2003, CARS.

[8]  Beat Hammer,et al.  Computer‐Assisted Secondary Reconstruction of Unilateral Posttraumatic Orbital Deformity , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Ziv Yaniv,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. , 2009, Medical physics.

[10]  Marco Caversaccio,et al.  The "Bernese" frameless optical computer aided surgery system. , 1999 .

[11]  J Mühling,et al.  Intraoperative computed tomography and automated registration for image-guided cranial surgery. , 2009, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  R. K. Münch,et al.  A novel tracking technique for the continuous precise measurement of tumour positions in conformal radiotherapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  R D Bucholz,et al.  Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localization using computerized tomography. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  Hans Blattmann,et al.  Combining magnetic and optical tracking for computer aided therapy. , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[16]  Jay B. West,et al.  Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Charles D. Hansen,et al.  An improved calibration framework for electromagnetic tracking devices , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[18]  R. Galloway,et al.  Volumetric characterization of the Aurora magnetic tracker system for image-guided transorbital endoscopic procedures , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  François Poulin,et al.  Interference during the use of an electromagnetic tracking system under OR conditions. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  M. Figl,et al.  Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  H Bergmann,et al.  Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers. , 1998, Medical physics.