Life cycle assessment of atmospheric emission profiles of the Italian geothermal power plants

Abstract After nearly a decade of only small development in capacity in deep geothermal sector in Europe, in recent years a resurgence of interest in geothermal power and the use of innovative technologies to increase and better exploit geo-thermoelectric generation has stolen the limelight from the scientific community. Differently from other types of energy sources, the environmental impacts determined by geothermal exploitation are extremely dependent on the geographical location. Life Cycle Assessment offers a powerful methodological approach for the investigation of the environmental footprint of power generation systems. Focusing on an unprecedented system-modelling approach for the investigation of an environmental impacts analysis of geo-thermoelectric activity in the Tuscany Region, Italy, in this work we perform a comprehensive environmental impact assessment for the calculation of atmospheric emissions profiles connected with the operational phase of the power plants. A clustering of all the geothermal installations in operation nowadays is performed by considering geographical representativeness This allows the identification of regional geothermal subareas. Moreover, an extensive data processing analysis is implemented with the aim of reconciling the great variability found among data collected. Results demonstrate that the efforts undertaken by the operator of the geothermal power plants to limit the impact of emissions, through abatement systems like AMIS, are quite effective. Indeed, in areas where mercury and ammonia concentration in fluids constitute a problem to deal with, nowadays the emissive patterns result comparable to the other ones. Notwithstanding, mercury and ammonia emissions, mainly emitted through the cooling towers, still represent a critical problem for all the geothermal fields. On the basis of our findings we conclude that potential chemical interactions and environmental impacts related to the variety of the compounds emitted should be object of future research and a further effort to minimize them.

[1]  V. Nicolardi,et al.  Reflectance spectral analyses for the assessment of environmental pollution in the geothermal site of Mt. Amiata (Italy) , 2013 .

[2]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of advanced technologies for photovoltaic panels production , 2010 .

[3]  Aldo Baldacci,et al.  Greening of Geothermal Power: An Innovative Technology for Abatement of Hydrogen Sulphide and Mercury Emission , 2005 .

[4]  Laura Vanoli,et al.  Integrating life cycle assessment and emergy synthesis for the evaluation of a dry steam geothermal power plant in Italy , 2015 .

[5]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Hybrid life cycle assessment of a geothermal plant: From physical to monetary inventory accounting , 2017 .

[6]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Flash Geothermal Power Plants—A Case Study , 2015 .

[7]  Guido Cappetti,et al.  FIFTEEN YEARS OF REINJECTION IN THE LARDERELLO-VALLE SECOLO AREA: ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCTION DATA , 1997 .

[8]  R. Dipippo Geothermal power plants : principles, applications, case studies and environmental impact , 2008 .

[9]  A. Manzella,et al.  Geothermal Resources in Italy: Tracing a Path Towards Public Engagement , 2018, Lecture Notes in Energy.

[10]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization , 2015 .

[11]  Ruggero Bertani,et al.  Geothermal power generation in the world 2005–2010 update report , 2012 .

[12]  Mario Martín-Gamboa,et al.  On the environmental suitability of high- and low-enthalpy geothermal systems , 2015 .

[13]  Isabelle Blanc,et al.  A simplified model for the estimation of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of enhanced geothermal systems , 2014, Geothermal Energy.

[14]  M. Narayan,et al.  Environmental assessment. , 1997, Home healthcare nurse.

[15]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations , 2013 .

[16]  S. Loppi,et al.  Lichens and mosses as biomonitors of trace elements in areas with thermal springs and fumarole activity (Mt. Amiata, central Italy). , 2000, Chemosphere.

[17]  Riccardo Basosi,et al.  Environmental impact of electricity from selected geothermal power plants in Italy , 2014 .

[18]  Marco Frey,et al.  Geothermal power in Italy: A social multi-criteria evaluation , 2014 .

[19]  Philipp Blum,et al.  Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation , 2013 .

[21]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  Development of dye sensitized solar cells: A life cycle perspective for the environmental and market potential assessment of a renewable energy technology , 2013 .

[22]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[23]  Costante Mario Invernizzi,et al.  Zero Emission Geothermal Flash Power Plant , 2017 .

[24]  Angelo Minissale,et al.  The Larderello geothermal field: a review , 1991 .

[25]  R. J. Romero,et al.  Life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation technologies: An updated review , 2017 .

[26]  Robin Girard,et al.  LCA of emerging technologies: addressing high uncertainty on inputs' variability when performing global sensitivity analysis. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Jeongwoo Han,et al.  Life-cycle analysis results of geothermal systems in comparison to other power systems. , 2010 .

[28]  Sverrir Thorhallsson,et al.  GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANTS , 2014 .

[29]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems , 2002 .

[30]  M. O'Sullivan,et al.  Reinjection in geothermal fields: A review of worldwide experience , 2011 .

[31]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  Environmental impact analysis applied to solar pasteurization systems , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[32]  P. Christensen,et al.  Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) , 2011 .

[33]  Sophie Bezelgues-Courtade,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of High Temperature Geothermal Energy Systems , 2015 .

[34]  Adele Manzella,et al.  Geothermal energy and the public: A case study on deliberative citizens’ engagement in central Italy , 2017 .

[35]  Geothermal Energy Production in Italy: An LCA Approach for Environmental Performance Optimization , 2018, Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Systems and Sustainable Energy Technologies.

[36]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling , 2017 .

[37]  P. Padey,et al.  From LCAs to simplified models: a generic methodology applied to wind power electricity. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  R. Bertani Geothermal power generation in the world 2010–2014 update report , 2016 .

[39]  Halldór Pálsson,et al.  Life cycle inventory of a flash geothermal combined heat and power plant located in Iceland , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[40]  Selene J. Chou HYDROGEN SULFIDE: HUMAN HEALTH ASPECTS , 2003 .

[41]  Michael Wang,et al.  Life-cycle analysis results for geothermal systems in comparison to other power systems: Part II. , 2012 .

[42]  Isabelle Blanc,et al.  A Simplified Life Cycle Approach for Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Wind Electricity , 2012 .

[43]  Riccardo Basosi,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of a micro CHP system fueled by low-temperature geothermal and solar energy , 2014 .

[44]  Ulrike Wirth,et al.  Geothermal Power Plants Principles Applications And Case Studies , 2016 .

[45]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems , 2013 .

[46]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  A matter of meters: state of the art in the life cycle assessment of enhanced geothermal systems , 2016 .

[47]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.