Word Semantics Is Processed Even without Attentional Effort

We examined the attentional modulation of semantic priming and the N400 effect for spoken words. The aim was to find out how the semantics of spoken language is processed when attention is directed to another modality (passive task), to the phonetics of spoken words (phonological task), or to the semantics of spoken words (word task). Equally strong behavioral priming effects were obtained in the phonological and the word tasks. A significant N400 effect was found in all tasks. The effect was stronger in the word and the phonological tasks than in the passive task, but there was no difference in the magnitude of the effect between the phonological and the word tasks. The latency of the N400 effect did not differ between the tasks. Although the N400 effect had a centroparietal maximum in the phonological and the word tasks, it was largest at the parietal recording sites in the passive task. The effect was more pronounced at the left than right recording sites in the phonological task, but there was no laterality effect in the other tasks. The N400 effect in the passive task indicates that semantic priming occurs even when spoken words are not actively attended. However, stronger N400 effect in the phonological and the word tasks than in the passive task suggests that controlled processes modulate the N400 effect. The finding that there were no differences in the N400 effect between the phonological and the word tasks indicates that the semantics of attended spoken words is processed regardless of whether semantic processing is relevant for task performance.

[1]  W. Ritter,et al.  The relationship between N2 and N400: scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[2]  C. A. Becker Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Vladimir López,et al.  ERPs and contextual semantic discrimination: Degrees of congruence in wakefulness and sleep , 2006, Brain and Language.

[4]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  MEG-compatible multichannel EEG electrode array. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[7]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  G. Houghton,et al.  ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Modulation of the Lexical–Semantic Network by Auditory Semantic Priming: An Event-Related Functional MRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  Charles D. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Automatic and Strategic Lexical-Semantics: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Differing Roles of Multiple Frontotemporal Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic Context Effects on Visual Word Processing: A Hybrid Prospective-Retrospective Processing Theory , 1989 .

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[15]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[16]  P. Michie,et al.  Modulation of Event-Related Potentials by Semantic Priming: Effects of Color-Cued Selective Attention , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Visual Word Priming Effects , 2000, Brain and Language.

[18]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I. Intracranial distribution and neural generators , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Neural Dissociations between Action Verb Understanding and Motor Imagery , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Fabien Perrin,et al.  Detection of verbal discordances during sleep , 2002, Neuroreport.

[22]  S. Blumstein,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Investigation of Implicit Semantic Priming , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Valdizán,et al.  Auditory event-related potentials to semantic priming during sleep. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  J. Connolly,et al.  The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences , 1990, Brain and Language.

[26]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The N400 as a function of the level of processing. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[28]  T. Shallice,et al.  Dual-Process Model in Semantic Priming: A Functional Imaging Perspective , 1999, NeuroImage.

[29]  M. Heil,et al.  Automatic Semantic Activation Is No Myth , 2004, Psychological science.

[30]  A. Nobre,et al.  The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Semantic processing in comatose patients with intact temporal lobes as reflected by the N400 event-related potential , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  M. Koivisto,et al.  Cognitive representations underlying the N400 priming effect. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Attention and mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[35]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Debruille,et al.  The N400 potential could index a semantic inhibition , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[40]  D. Schacter,et al.  Reductions in cortical activity during priming , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  G McCarthy,et al.  Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[43]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[44]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Word processing in the brain as revealed by neurophysiological imaging , 2007 .

[45]  F. Perrin,et al.  Modulation of the N400 potential during auditory phonological/semantic interaction. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  Mireille Besson,et al.  Brain potentials during semantic and prosodic processing in French. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[48]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[49]  G. Bower,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND M·OTIVATION , 2001 .

[50]  M. Slifstein,et al.  Impact of presynaptic dopamine activity on D1 radiotracer binding in vivo in rodent brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[51]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[52]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[53]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  High-density mapping in an N400 paradigm: evidence for bilateral temporal lobe generators , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[55]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Effects of Automatic Associative Activation on Explicit and Implicit Memory Tests , 1992 .

[56]  M. Heil,et al.  Semantic activation, letter search and N400: A reply to Mari-Beffa, Valdes, Cullen, Catena and Houghton (2005) , 2006, Brain Research.

[57]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Semantic processing of unattended meaning is modulated by additional task load: evidence from electrophysiology. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.