Sliding Autonomy for Peer-To-Peer Human-Robot Teams

The vision of humans and robots working together as peers to accomplish complex tasks has motivated many recent research endeavors with a variety of applications ranging from lunar construction to soccer. However, much of this research is still at an early stage, and many challenges still remain in realizing this vision. A key requirement for enabling robustness and efficiency in human-robot teams is the ability to dynamically adjust the level of autonomy to optimize the use of resources and capabilities as conditions evolve. While sliding autonomy is well defined and understood in applications where a single human is working with a single robot, it is largely unexplored when applied to teams of humans working with multiple robots. This paper highlights the challenges of enabling sliding autonomy in peer-to-peer human-robot teams and extends the current literature to identify and extend six key capabilities that are essential for overcoming these challenges. These capabilities are requesting help, maintaining coordination, establishing situational awareness, enabling interactions at different levels of granularity, prioritizing team members, and learning from interactions. We demonstrate the importance of several of these characteristics with results from a peer-to-peer human-robot team engaged in a treasure hunt task.

[1]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[2]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[3]  Miles C. Walton,et al.  Collaborative Tools for Mixed Teams of Humans and Robots , 2003 .

[4]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy Challenges in Personal Assistant Agents: A Position Paper , 2003, Agents and Computational Autonomy.

[5]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy in the Context of Coordination , 2004 .

[6]  Anthony Stentz,et al.  Robust multirobot coordination in dynamic environments , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[7]  M. Veloso,et al.  The first segway soccer experience: towards peer-to-peer human-robot teams , 2006, HRI '06.

[8]  Lynne E. Parker,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Human-Robot Teaming through Reconfigurable Schemas , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: To Boldly Go Where No Human-Robot Team Has Gone Before.

[9]  Brett Browning,et al.  Dynamically formed heterogeneous robot teams performing tightly-coordinated tasks , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[10]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Coordinated Multiagent Teams and Sliding Autonomy for Large-Scale Assembly , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Terry Fong To boldly go where no human-robot team has gone before : papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium , 2006 .

[12]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A Preliminary Study of Peer-to-Peer Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[13]  Alexander I. Rudnicky,et al.  Dynamically Formed Human-Robot Teams Performing Coordinated Tasks , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: To Boldly Go Where No Human-Robot Team Has Gone Before.

[14]  Frauke Driewer,et al.  Discussion of Challenges for User Interfaces in Human-Robot Teams , 2007, EMCR.